
Originally Posted by
Chronons
However, all it takes is one good dps to burst down a good healer.
More correctly: All it takes is one good DPS to burst down a bad healer.
A burst rotation generally takes around 2-3 seconds after setting it up and the healer may not hit Lustrate/Dignity/Tetra on the target in those seconds because otherwise your burst will fail. Since purify is a thing and the most a DPS can stun for with a single ability is 3 seconds, you'll not be able to prevent them from hitting that button for so long without help. You will need someone, either to supplement your damage, to force their Purify in advance or to force their instant CDs - You can test that quite well in the dueling area nowadays.
In a real game, naturally, you'll frequently get help from another DPS to create those conditions. And the healer will frequently get help from the tank to prevent a kill anyway. It's why it's frequently better not to focus the healer in the first place, but rather CC them and burst someone else out of line of sight or while the healer is sleeping/stunned/knocked away and rooted. I wager it's less viable in team queue since other people can purify the healer as well, but in solo queue, that used to be a fairly rare thing from my experiences.

Originally Posted by
KusoWat
It's funny because the only thing in my statement directed to you individually was the last sentence.
And the rest implied that whoever doesn't like the state of things simply didn't learn how to play, which is an indirect ad hominem towards anyone for whom that condition is true. Something you do again when you say:"PvP in this game is actually quite fun for those that take the time to learn it.".
To put the sentence in logical terms:"If you put the time to learn how to play, then PvP is fun."
Formalized: A=>B, or from A follows B.
Now, the table for a logical implication looks like this:
A - B - A=>B
T - T - T
T - F - F
F - T - T
F - F - T
(F standing for false and T for true respectively)
If the implication is true, then not having fun and having learned it isn't possible, because in that case the implication is false. If the first part of the implication is false, the rest doesn't matter, the implication is always true (Logic is fun like that!). The only case where you can not have fun and the implication is true is when you didn't take the time to learn it (False, False). This leads to the logical conclusion above, an indirect ad hominem that people who don't like the status quo need to git gut.
Now, to take up my own advice, I'll put it in spoilers to not take up too much space.
That aside: I'm still curious what "We" know about me and my gaming habits. You unfortunately didn't quite answer that and only alleged I took offense.