The New Chat Restriction in The Feast

[Ama_Hamada]

If you need to boycott a game-mode in the first place then we clearly see how bad the PvP community has become with it's toxicity.

Regardless of whether such a boycott is justified or not, lumping the PvP community together based on the actions of a few just goes to show again how biased and ignorant you and others such as yourself are.
But I guess anyone has to put in their two cents these days; who cares if you don't know what you're talking about, right?

Or the fact people go great lengths to bend the facts to support their narrative. The statement hardly makes sense unless this person is insinuating I am toxic and these actions to reflect that so the ban was justified?? I am sure it is a post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy but I hardly understand what is being said to begin with, the sentence structure itself fits the criteria though.