


This is already nonsense because DoM already got some armor (Yeah armor but not heavy enough but still, armor) like power ranger and ffxi's forgot-the-name armor too.



Mages in light armor doesn't bother me at all, I don't know where you got that impression? The Daystar set is absolutely beautiful, for example. Well, except for the crown, but that's my opinion.
Correct! You can't glam what you can't wear because it's job specific, thank you for pointing out the way the glamour system works. Once you can use it as a glam on multiple jobs, it stops being job specific, like the BRD's Kirimu Coat became generic glamour, and as a result went from being a cool look, to a generically 'meh' piece of gear.
Last edited by Thunda_Cat_SMASH; 01-02-2017 at 05:08 AM.


[QUOTE=Thunda_Cat_SMASH;3980366
Correct! You can't glam what you can't wear because it's job specific, thank you for pointing out the way the glamour system works. Once you can use it as a glam on multiple jobs, it stops being job specific, like the BRD's Kirimu Coat became generic glamour, and as a result went from being a cool look, to a generically 'meh' piece of gear.[/QUOTE]
You can currently not glamour what you can't wear because of technical limitations - not because of lore or logic. Gear could stay job specific even if glamours of the gear was not.
That a look would change from 'cool' to 'meh' just because it is no longer restricted to a certain job is just plain stupid and ridiculous. Looks are not better because they are job-specific - quite the opposite in fact.
That's not true. There's no technical limitation. Just the opposite. It would have been easier for SE to allow you to use all glamours the same. Instead they specifically put an extra check into the glamour system to make sure that it was available to your current job in order to display it, because they wanted the wearable requirements to apply to glamour as well.
(I might have preferred the rule to be that the item not be restricted to another job alone, rather than that you have to be able to equip the item. But that's a different point, and I already made it in a previous post.)
In the case of AF, though, that's pretty much irrelevant, since it's specifically the look of the gear that's part of the job identity. If the look isn't job specific, then the AF isn't job specific, so really isn't even AF any more.
Last edited by Niwashi; 01-04-2017 at 10:54 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


