DEV REQUEST (again): The Emperor's New Shield

[ErikMynhier]

Yes, yes, I know, its been asked for before.... Its not realistic (though blocking the punch of Titan with it is ok for some reason).... It'll never happen.... More important things to fix.... on and on and on. Yes I know.


Now with that out of the way let me get to my point. As has been stated lately DEVs listen to upvotes. I was hopeful to get upvotes of this post if you too want to hide your often times ugly shield. I mean come on, with the power behind some of the mobs we face, surely a shield or your armored gauntlet make little difference. I love shields, I really do, but sometimes, some glams would look better with out the board.

So what do you think? You wanna be an even bigger fantasy knight? Think I'm stupid for asking? Do you think the cash shop is bad? Nevermind that last one.

Do remember to LIKE this post if you want this. As I said the DEVs have stated they take note of LIKEs so click that button and maybe we will get lucky. Hell maybe we will anyway, that GARO vid had no shields.... ah, wishful thinking, so warm, so comfortable.


EDIT
From the Garo Live Letter

The more achievements you get from PvP, the more rewards you can get from it. The rewards can be obtained in two stages 1. Gold Saucer - Equipments undyable 2. PvP -Dyeable Apparently shield can be glamoured with Emperor's New Shield so that the shield will disappear It's one of the future QoL feature. Another video. It's probably a repeat from before. Release date of the collaboration event: January 17th Same day as the release date of Patch 3.5 Fujita-san promoting his next actor work Zero, who is going to be aired next month Another guest coming in. The gold armor - PLD, Garo The silver armor - NIN, Zero The next video is a trailer for Fujita's next work, Zero Ending note for PLL Speech from Fujita Rei Speech from Keita Amemiya Closing note from Yoshida Here closes the 34th PLL, thank you for watching.

[GMERC]

"liking" the post is of course, an entirely one-sided conversation. which means gauging something on likes is probably the worst way to do anything because it isn't able to gauge dislike for an idea.

yes to more bucklers, no to invisible shields. if you can't make glamours work that's your creativity failing, not the game's fault. if you want a sword job that doesn't use a shield, wait for something that isn't Paladin.

[ErikMynhier]

"liking" the post is of course, an entirely one-sided conversation. which means gauging something on likes is probably the worst way to do anything because it isn't able to gauge dislike for an idea.

yes to more bucklers, no to invisible shields. if you can't make glamours work that's your creativity failing, not the game's fault. if you want a sword job that doesn't use a shield, wait for something that isn't Paladin.

I agree with you whole heartedly it is a bad way to communicate my desire, but this is the documented way by which the attention can be gotten by the DEVs. I am currently at work so I cannot look up citations of where it was said but in a nutshell they take note of LIKEs and reply counts. So as an advocate of this addition I have little recourse but to frame it like this.

As I said at the bottom in a joking matter, feel free to debate the merits or lack their of below. I apologize for the limited scope of the thread, but this is something I would really like added to the game and don't have any other real way to express it.

To your point I wish the forums has a thumbs up/down option like youtube sports.

[GMERC]

How would you feel if Sword Oath switched your character to a double-hand stance with their shield on their back?

[ErikMynhier]

How would you feel if Sword Oath switched your character to a double-hand stance with their shield on their back?

That would be interesting actually.

[Hen-Hen]

How would you feel if Sword Oath switched your character to a double-hand stance with their shield on their back?

ooo, cool idea. I'd like it.

[ErikMynhier]

I suppose the expectance of this request lays solely on where your suspension of reality lies.

For some there is the "pull yourself by your bootstraps" mentality. Like the gent in the first reply shows. An automatic dislike of the idea due to a desire for clear boundaries, not a bad thing in and of itself.

Another group in in actuality based on realism, with some claiming tanks in no robes and shields as a must due to the physical damage they are seen to take. Doing so without a barrier of metal disrupts their immersion.

The other sub group is where I am, that no shield, no matter how strong, no armor no mater how strong, would take what we see taken, so my immersion was dusted a ways back and I have excepted it and now just want to look esthetically pleasing to myself.

All three types are valid in their arguments.

The shield on the back sounds fun, but for me I would like at least a command that hides the shield, the way the Summoners will soon change their Egi, or at most an EN item to completely hide it as the Monks got for their claws. That is my hope.

[Shippuu]

You may be in luck actually because during the panel talking about the Garo collaboration I do believe Yoshida mentioned there would indeed be an Emperor's New Shield implemented.

Edit: Pulled this from the Reddit/Discord translation from the event:

Apparently shield can be glamoured with Emperor's New Shield so that the shield will disappear

So, take that as you will.

[Fjaere]

I think this would be more trouble than its worth having to redesign animations so PLD doesnt look silly without a shield.

[ErikMynhier]

You may be in luck actually because during the panel talking about the Garo collaboration I do believe Yoshida mentioned there would indeed be an Emperor's New Shield implemented.

Edit: Pulled this from the Reddit/Discord translation from the event:


So, take that as you will.

Really? I got thinking about this again because the vid for that event had no shield and I thought.... "Wouldn't it be nice if..."

Do you have a link to the translations?