Please lift glamour restrictions!

[StarRosie]

Why?

I mean, tell me that those summoner boots don't look neat with that scholar cloak. Do summoners really have a monopoly on brown leather lace-up thigh highs?

It's about letting the jobs keep their visual identity. While I agree the fact we can have all the jobs on a single character does cheapen or at least take away some of that exclusivity/uniqueness feel to the jobs. I feel like letting their personal gear be spread across EVERYTHING is a little much. Though, one could also make the argument that while sure a Monk could glamour the pants from a BRD artifact set, those pants still belong to the BRD and the set overall still belongs to their visual identity.

But there is also the argument that people glamour their jobs to such a degree that the only thing making you go "Oh, that person is a WAR." is the fact they have a big axe on their back and they have WAR's moves. It's a very nuanced argument with a very fine thread you gotta balance on. That's why I say, at least dungeon sets that are just recolors upon recolors shouldn't have class restrictions on glams.

Lore.

You don't wear a McDonalds uniform to officiate a wedding at a chapel, do you? (bad analogy, same situation though)

I actually think that's a pretty good analogy from that stand point. However as Mimilu below me puts it. You then have those themed weddings where you got the groom dressed as Han Solo and the bride dressed as Leia and the officiate is Vader for some reason. Again, very nuanced discussion here, where the ultimate question is. Where do you draw the line?