Please lift glamour restrictions!

[GMERC]

Hyperbole doesn't win arguments and makes your argument look silly >w>
Take a chill pill, brah, it's glamour. B-D

The moment the "why can't my character equip this other job's item? it's just a shirt after all!!" argument came out we had already passed the point of no return. The moment someone starts pushing that silliness the discussion is basically over, because it becomes a discussion about "why should RPG mechanics exist? that's not realistic!!"

[ErryK]

I'm fine with unlocking certain articles of gear. But artifact gear should remain as it is, locked to their respective job(s).

[AlphaFox]

That's how I also partially agree with the glamour reestrictions removal. Keeping them to these sets (tomestones, raids, AF) that give the job their identity is one thing, but dungeons drops look kinda generic and should be available for all jobs. They are also nice looking pieces.

That, plus we end up getting recolored versions later for different classes in dungeons.

[StarRosie]

The moment the "why can't my character equip this other job's item? it's just a shirt after all!!" argument came out we had already passed the point of no return.

Says who? You? I'm sorry, didn't know you were a moderator or some grandmaster who decides where the point of no return is. In my opinion, the point has some validity, the jobs do lose some of their exclusivity and uniqueness when you can just have ALL of them on a single character. Now there are parts of the argument I disagree with but that's a whole different thing. But this comes back to the whole "contribute to the conversation." thing. You seem to be trying to end the conversation rather then contribute to it or have a discussion (That thing these forums are for.).

That's how I also partially agree with the glamour reestrictions removal. Keeping them to these sets (tomestones, raids, AF) that give the job their identity is one thing, but dungeons drops look kinda generic and should be available for all jobs. They are also nice looking pieces.

I agree. I was actually looking forward to getting the Woad set for my WAR. It seemed like the perfect set for it but then I noticed the tank set has this stupid shoulder pad thing that obstructs the tattoo all the other Woad sets get. Which is odd since Broken Mountain (The HW mentor for WAR.) is wearing the Woad set without the shoulder pad. So it's a little weird...

[Naunet]

I'm fine with unlocking certain articles of gear. But artifact gear should remain as it is, locked to their respective job(s).

Why?

I mean, tell me that those summoner boots don't look neat with that scholar cloak. Do summoners really have a monopoly on brown leather lace-up thigh highs?

[myahele]

The Chinese (or was it Korean) version of the game already has a lv.1 glamour version of the Crafter and Gather's AFs in the cash shop.

I'm pretty sure those would at least show up in our version of the game eventually

[Mimilu]

The moment the "why can't my character equip this other job's item? it's just a shirt after all!!" argument came out we had already passed the point of no return. The moment someone starts pushing that silliness the discussion is basically over, because it becomes a discussion about "why should RPG mechanics exist? that's not realistic!!"

Except no one here has said anything about any of that...
They only said they would like to wear a pair of boots and a jacket using a system that already lets you make armor look like a bikini.
There may be a few people who can snowball and ask for such things but they are few and will usually fade away if you just ignore them. :-B

[bswpayton]

I think we should I mean come on the big elephant in the room is we can play all Jobs on one,and the story makes zero sense out of explaining why or how, aside from oh your the warrior of light. If anything at least being able to glam it over will show that we can do all these things so we should be able to wear anything we want.

A dark knight should be able to wear a whm robe ,because they can be a whm, so why restrict the gear you can wear. If we have this system of playing any job you want we should be able to wear any glam we want because we are all jobs. I wear a mag hat on my drk all the time and lots of cloth type items it seems the tanks actually can choose from the biggest variety of gear almost doesnt seem fair.

[ErryK]

Why?

I mean, tell me that those summoner boots don't look neat with that scholar cloak. Do summoners really have a monopoly on brown leather lace-up thigh highs?

Lore.

You don't wear a McDonalds uniform to officiate a wedding at a chapel, do you? (bad analogy, same situation though)

[Miyha]

Part of me likes that there are job-exclusive glamours, but the other part of me hates it because when you change to another job your glamour looks like poop. :r

I still wish they could implement a system where glamours were tied to your job/class. Switch a job, switch your glamour. Would be so nice, but I know, they can't do it due to memory limitations. QQ (Least I think that's the excuse they gave.)