Should PLD and WAR get gap-closers at 70?

[ArdorGrey]

Sure. In exchange, I'll take Equilibrium, Thrill of Battle, off-gcd stance swaps, Spirits Within, an on-demand stun, a magic damage version of Cover, Sheltron, Fight or Flight, Divine Veil, and an invincibility move that isn't healer dependent.

Every tank already has a method of negating knockback, one of which doesn't even require a target.

Funny how the person that constantly creates opportunities to talk about how superior they are for playing the "truly challenging class" "becoz mp managment is kewel" turns around and says they want every great ability every other tank has just to do away with how archaic lacking gap closers on tanks is.

Tanks are expected to lead dungeon runs. and yet they are the *least* mobile class by a wide margin, drk just slightly less than the other two.

This is *terrible design*, not something to stroke your ego over. It's the very definition of counter-intuitive.

Then again you're contrary enough to insist WAR is terribly designed, and then turn around and say you want all their goodies and much, much, more. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised.

That said, it's possible to give other tanks gap closers while maintaining(and hopefully expanding) each tanks unique flavor and gameplay style.

EDIT: to be fair, I actually use equilibrium to sprint in dungeons, especially if I have a good ninja in my group. So maybe WAR doesn't need it.

But some sort of shield charge for pld would be great and perfectly thematic, basically every sword and board archetype ever has something along those lines, it's kinda weird that it isn't here.

Personally I'd rather see it as a single target high potency ability instead of an Aoe, though that would be further cramping drks style I suppose, and doubling as an aoe might help make pld more appealing for dungeon runs period, since right now they're strictly the worst for that.