We've so little to go off. I've repeated a lot of my thoughts before and this is basically calling for another 20 page argument that I'm not sure I want to indulge in, but sure.

There's actually a pretty wide open door for Hydaelyn to be lost and Zodiark to be lost
I'm of the quoted belief; we're on the path that will destroy both Hydaelyn and Zodiark unless something changes. Just continuing to play this game of destroy the Ascian isn't going to solve the tiny, itty-bitty problem that Hydaelyn and Zodiark were split into instability the first place.

Change needs to come, somehow. The root of the problem needs to be fixed and I don't believe destroying Zodiark is going to make all of our problems go away.

In regards to your Elidibus bit, I wouldn't be against us making a mistake on the larger scale, but I still say the story is more interesting if Hydaelyn did in Her best intentions, like Altana in XI when creating the new world with a future She favored, leading to all of existence being unbalanced.

Quote Originally Posted by Fenral View Post
Honestly, I think this is the most important part of what she talked about. It has the potential to mean that the Ascians' objectives can be accomplished without calamitous loss of life on our side. Assuming we can find a reason to assist them, as Eldibus thinks we can, we may be able to get out of this without dropping any more moons on anyone.
I absolutely agree. If SE will go that path, well, it's just left to be seen.


But back to the real topic...

I'll go ADC in bot lane with Cilia as support. Cyril go mid, Theodric go top. Kaiser-Ace, can you jungle?
On it.