I propose when we use Living Dead that we turn into Jack Skellington, and then when we use Souleater, it not only absorbs the enemy's soul, but deals 1000% enmity.
Because it is dead. On Halloween.
I propose when we use Living Dead that we turn into Jack Skellington, and then when we use Souleater, it not only absorbs the enemy's soul, but deals 1000% enmity.
Because it is dead. On Halloween.
another thought outta the blue, not sure how well it would affect the job but...perhaps adding a 5% debuff to dot damage for dark arts power slash?
If you mean by this that only one job could bring slashing down then it should propably be NiN, not sure how it would gimp their rotation tho. If they did this then SE could swap potencies between BB and SE to make it proper DPS combo ender.
Last edited by Synestra; 03-06-2016 at 07:12 PM.
As a tank, your role is to offer mitigation, so you should want to put the STR debuff.
The problem with PS combo is not that it's a DPS loss, it's that it offers nothing besides enmity.
As I see DRK, PS should be given the INT debuff, Delirium should be the highest DPS combo, and DA-Souleater shoud only increase the leeching effect. This way, you'd have three combo with a very different purpose.
As for giving DRK an OT utility, I'd really think DA-Blood Weapon should offer a raidwide leech, but not necessarily of MP. And the DA-SoulEater would be useless as an OT, offering more room to use DA on something else.
They could adjust the potencies of NIN so Slashing Debuff would be part of their optimal rotation.
I mean - in fairness - it already is part of their optimal rotation. They just don't use it, because it's better not to, if a WAR provides a slashing debuff.
Disembowel works because it's not an option in the Dragoon rotation - it just happens as a natural result of doing your shit. No one ever consciously thinks about whether or not Disembowel is up - you don't need to choose a lower potency combo in order to re-activate it; it's self-fixing. The most important thing to note, though, is that, in an optimal party composition, Disembowel helps just one additional player - the Bard or Machinist. Rarely will you have both. If you have a second DRG, it doesn't do anything. Who cares? You overwrite back and forth anyway.
Slashing Debuff helps out two additional players - either both tanks, or the other tank and the ninja (if one's present). This suddenly makes it far more necessary a debuff. There's no real way to adjust NIN to make DE part of their max dps rotation with a Warrior present unless it's stronger than Aeolian Edge or affords some other buff that Aeolian Edge's combo does not. Storm's Eye is not optimal to WAR because of its potency or even its debuff (if the dps from using it was more of a loss than the NIN using DE, the NIN would use DE...) - it's because it chains off of Maim and is stronger than the alternatives (Storm's Path or just going back to a BB combo). They could do something weird by making Dancing Edge a 3-step combo building off of Shadow Fang, maybe. THAT could be interesting.
I just think it's all a little silly. The easiest way to fix the issue is to apply a slashing debuff to one of the other tanks. I don't think this is as difficult as people make it out to be...
Last edited by JackFross; 03-08-2016 at 10:18 AM.
Then you'd better let a DRK take the MT role and rotate between GB and RA
In all seriousness, with the increased enmity on Savage Blade and Shield Oath, you can afford less RoH if the STR debuff is useless
It should be a part of it, wether or not you have a WAR, exactly like how you describe disembowel.
For example, even if you have two WAR, and providing you don't need the healing or the damage mitigation of Storm's Path, they'll both use Storm's Eye, just because they have Maim on the way.
For NIN, instead of having three WS after Gust Slash, you could have Spinning Edge - Dancing Edge - Armor Crush. Since extending Huton is necessary, you'd just apply the debuff whatever setup you have.
Last edited by Reynhart; 03-08-2016 at 04:03 PM.
This is why i still pretty much exclusively play war. I have no problem sacrificing 40potency to keep superior path up if needed compared to mana problems on drk or having to sacrifice 90potency on pld to have str down up.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.