Results -9 to 0 of 181

Threaded View

  1. #30
    Player
    Reaperking386's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    655
    Character
    Ertai Spelldragon
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallera View Post
    And I find that your concern is more a slippery slope than anything.

    Of course weapons wont be glamoured across. But SE's reason for restricting glamour across armor is and remains bs. That cashmere bolero that just HAD to be a healer piece? You can now wear for mnk as the rainbow bolero. The foestriker gear available across DoW? Dyable version is BRD onry. Meanwhile, swinsuits and reindeer outfits for everyone! I play a drk, and I happily don't have the armored brooding look, more courtesy of 1.0's items than the "material garment of verb" that is being slapped on almost EVERYTHING not ilvl 1 since.

    The restrictions often make little sense.



    Isn't this entire argument post a slippery slope? :/ that is what everyone is saying as for an argument at least. For example, "Since we have bikini's and flying turtles we should have unrestricted glamour." What is there now to stop players down the road saying, "not good enough, I want my staff to look like an ax!" I am sorry guys, but I am still not convinced and am very much on the Dev side atm.
    (2)
    Last edited by Reaperking386; 01-12-2016 at 03:06 AM.

Tags for this Thread