Why Removing Houses from inactive is NOT a solution.

[Titor]

Everyone demonizes SE for trying to make their game more profitable by ensuring you need to pay them to use their servers? Those brigands!

The system would only punish the very small number of housing owners and essentially make them slaves to their subscriptions. It is not a good system to inflict on a small minority of players alone, for a system that many other games can handle flawlessly.

[Dererk]

The system would only punish the very small number of housing owners and essentially make them slaves to their subscriptions. It is not a good system to inflict on a small minority of players alone, for a system that many other games can handle flawlessly.

Or it would be the real players who would be owning houses. The ones who play every day or 3 4 days out of the week. If they unsubscribed they have no reason to have it no matter how long and how much hard work they went threw to get it keep housing for the people who are playing.

[Naunet]

Or it would be the real players who would be owning houses. The ones who play every day or 3 4 days out of the week. If they unsubscribed they have no reason to have it no matter how long and how much hard work they went threw to get it keep housing for the people who are playing.

SE should just start taking away your gil when you unsubscribe. Minions? What good are they when you're unsubscribed? Gone. All that space your retainers (not just the additional ones, but the default ones too) and their inventory take up would be better put to use elsewhere, so yeah we'll take that as well. Maybe reset your chocobo to default color. Oh and you're not using your GC or PvP ranks anymore, so let's just wipe those out while we're at it.