Why Removing Houses from inactive is NOT a solution.

[Syrehn]

Unless you work for SE directly, this is a pretty definitive statement. They could very well tack on instanced housing to the current housing, similar to how they added other/new features to current housing (airships, private rooms, etc).

It's a definitive statement because SE is already making steps in the direction that will continue to support their current model. These steps are the inactivity timer, house sharing, and that they'll be adding more wards once they iron out their housing transfer system.

No I don't work for SE but, but as mentioned in my previous post, considering that we're 2 years into FC housing (released in 2.1) and 1 year into personal housing (released in 2.38) it's highly unlikely any instanced housing changes will be made (who knows though I could be wrong). IMO, if they had any intentions of altering their system to incorporate instanced housing it would have been done already.

[Titor]

IMO, if they had any intentions of altering their system to incorporate instanced housing it would have been done already.

They were not even sure the game was going to succeed in the reboot, so they were probably just using what resources they had to see if there was enough interest to continue with it. Heck, we are /just now/ getting the ability to try on multiple items. Or get a proper EU datacenter. I think we are just beginning to see proper structual revamps and system/QoL changes.