FC Chest just gets raded, and GMs can do nothing.

[DragonHunterG]

yea when people join a FC, the new person doesn't get defaulted to the lowest rank, so you have to be actively aware and demote them immediately after joining, has been my experience.

[Maracrea13x]

yea when people join a FC, the new person doesn't get defaulted to the lowest rank, so you have to be actively aware and demote them immediately after joining, has been my experience.

The trick to this is maintain the default rank as the lowest rank never modify it, they will always default to the one with circle and 4 triangles on it. This is the symbol will always be on that rank. Also there is a picture i believe posted by Spoon Son on Page 2 as "Trial Member".

[Nyerieri]

Here is the symbol again in case people don't want to look back on the thread



Also OP - I took a look at your FC on the loadstone. I would suggest talking to your FC leader and add more then 3 ranks.. The above symbol is the one ALL new members will start at.. which you have all your members at (minus the 17 officers you have). Usually that rank turns into "no authorizations" for most FC's.

[Galactimus]

All right. You guys win ¯\_( ツ )_/¯

Clearly its the consensus that immoral thieves should be allowed to get away with anything they want when someone makes a mistake. GM's have no right getting involved. Run wild and be free FC chest raiders; it's your time to shine!

[joshdavis271]

All right. You guys win ¯\_( ツ )_/¯

Clearly its the consensus that immoral thieves should be allowed to get away with anything they want when someone makes a mistake. GM's have no right getting involved. Run wild and be free FC chest raiders; it's your time to shine!

And you totally missed the point on how FCs work, so its no use in repeating over and over.

[DukeBurden]

I like how the general theme in this thread is "fuck you." So, OP, I will sympathize with you. Sometimes it really sucks when people are allowed to walk away with crap like this. Even though you can prove and provide all the evidence, GMs let this stuff go. There's no reason something can't be done about this. For every person here that posted saying "you let it happen", I hope something bad happens to them and when it comes time for us to hear their complaints and stories of being done wrong, we can say "life's rough, deal with it."

[Sub-Xero]

Ah forums... You guys are all so wonderful and cheery. Remember kids: If you make a mistake or have a lapse in judgement, whatever happens to you is your fault, you were "asking for it" and you got just what you deserved. I hope all you "victim blamers" live by the code(s) you preach here on the forums.

[Nyerieri]

Again, you are asking Square to be held liable for whoever set the rank settings. I can tell you quite a few who posted here live by what we posted. I can personally say we've never had anyone steal from us because we have multiple ranks in our FC!

[Maracrea13x]

If I messed up like this, I would NOT be here qqing because SE is not going to fix it.. Thats life.

[ElHeggunte]

Ah forums... You guys are all so wonderful and cheery. Remember kids: If you make a mistake or have a lapse in judgement, whatever happens to you is your fault, you were "asking for it" and you got just what you deserved. I hope all you "victim blamers" live by the code(s) you preach here on the forums.

Well I mean the OP's complaint is just like handing a stranger the keys to your house and getting mad when they steal all of your stuff. SE already gave us the tools to prevent exactly this from happening and his FC leader apparently didn't make appropriate use of them. That's not SE's fault nor should SE waste GM manpower on policing this.