

To be honest, yes. Because I was not expecting such a regressive line of thinking. That is essentially a "smashing the entire board" option, everyone lose, and no one gain anything. So instead of trying to make it better for everyone, you prefer to screw everyone up ... well, almost everyone with the exception of the developers. You're basically wanting to give SE, the one party that is solely responsible for this system, essentially a free pass.
No, I simply recognize that the system as it exists is extremely unfair, and until SE makes it fair and accessible there is no reason to devote any further development to it. Players with houses already have access to a myriad of unique and significant gameplay functions. Until SE fixes the system, players with houses have more than enough and SE needs to devote their time and energy toward fixing the system rather than giving more exclusive content away to the few people that took advantage of the system as it presently exists.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

