If you don't have a house and complaining ...

[Raven2014]

I think you're lucky, because at the very least your money is still in your pocket. I'm not sure how you will take it, but I think people with private housing has it far worse.

The main reason is it seems private housing is all but forgotten to the developer. When it was introduced 2.38, private housing were every bit a piece the same as FC house from their cost to function, and that's how most people assume how it gonna be going forward. After all, the main reason was that we wanted all the benefit of an FC house, but with our personal control instead having to share or controlled by others. But pretty much every piece of major contents released for housing have been FC house exclusive. Private housing has been left out for dried.

This greatly contribute to the death of neighborhood. I haven't touched my house for at least 6 months now because there is no reason to. Sure I come back once in a bluemoon to put in a new piece of furniture, but that's it. And here it presents another major problem with the housing market - it's heavily punish private housing to change hand - both on the buyer and seller side.

- For those who don't own a house, there is a stupid system in place that all the major house decor can't be retrieved once place. So if a house is relinquish, they're gone for good. And a medium house unless the owner don't care about it, probably have furniture worth at least half of the house itself, wouldn't be a surprise if the decor of a mansion is worth as much as the house itself.

- For FC house it's not an issue because the house can be transferred. This provides 2 advantages: first the buyer don't have to "double pay" for the seller to relinquish the land and rebuy it. Secondly, how much furniture inside the house can be used as a negotiation point. In the end, the seller lose less, and the buyer pay less.

- For private housing, not only there is the double pay in place, the irretrievable furniture discourage a lot private homeowner from selling their house even if they want to. Take me for example, I want to sell my house, but I don't want to write off all of my decor. So I have to include part of it in my listing price, and, understandably, if someone on the market for a house - especially for private use - they will find the asking price too much, and understandably I also will not go down with my price either. I don't want to sell for a profit, but if I have to incur a large loss to sell it, than I'll just keep it.

So you end up with people like me (which I doubt the only one), who want to sell the house but still stubbornly hold into it unless there is an FC desperate enough for a house and cough up the money for it. Again if you say "so lower your price if you want to sell it", than my answer is "as someone who manage enough to buy a house in the first place, I'm not desperate with gil enough to sell my house at a loss". So, it's a lose-lose situation.

The last part is to add to the many existing discussions about housing. A lot of people assumed dead neighborhood was because people stop playing, and that's only partially true. My neighborhood is dead, but pretty much everyone in the area are still playing. I know because we have a LS for the neighborhood and we all pretty much talk to each other everyday, it's just all of us stay at our FC house instead of our private house. If there is a way to make private house ownership easy to transfer like with FC house, I bet a lot of people will be more than happy to part with their house ATM.

I know there are a lot of bad blood between those who have a house and those who have not. But I want you to know we owner have our own beef to deal with, and that is we are for the most part largely forgotten by the developers. I want private house enjoy the same new content as FC house, failing that make it easy to transfer and I would be more than happy to put my house back to the market. And again, if you want a house for private use and don't have one, consider yourself lucky. We can agree on one thing, is that the housing system is messed up.

On that note, I have a medium house on Gilgamesh that I want to sell if anyone is interested. But if you want to buy I hope you have the money, since I want to sell it, but I'm not in desperate need to sell it. (And unless you're buying it for your FC, it's NOT worth it to buy it for private house).

[m3eansean]

This game needs a housing age system very badly. So that people who are bored and don't touch it in 6 months lose their claim, so that another play with the money and interest can occupy the spot.

With such a limited supply of housing, I am shocked an aging system wasn't actually put in place yet. They tried once, but backpedaled on it very early.

[Firepower]

I'm in a similar place, since everything I need now is in Ishgard, travelling to my house just makes it more expensive to teleport back to Ishgard, especially since summoning bells and repairers are in Idyllshire the only other place you need to go is Foundation to collect daily/weekly marks (if people even still do those now that you can buy the upgrade items with poetics)

Finally since my house offers me no benefit (I tired of gardening and they won't allow me to share my plot with anyone else who might use them) I just wish they would let me sell the damn thing for a reasonable price to someone.

[Raven2014]

This game needs a housing age system very badly. So that people who are bored and don't touch it in 6 months lose their claim, so that another play with the money and interest can occupy the spot.

I have been subscribe and playing almost everyday for the last six month, why should I be losing the house that I spent 40mil on? Yeah I haven't really touch it, because there is no reason to touch it with, but is that my fault? And this is why this kind of discussion get toxic real fast, people often just selfishly think about their own benefit and don't give a crap about others. So often time people turn around and crap on each others instead with the "you want to screw me? Well, screw you!" attitude.

Or maybe you just read the tittle without even reading the content of the post.

[Sylfaein]

He says, from the balcony of his 40M gil mansion...

[Disc]

He says, from the balcony of his 40M gil mansion...

I wish.

I have a mansion, and I like it. It's located right in a nice little plaza with market board & summoning bell, has my mailbox, striking dummy, garden, etc that I get to use without the massive crowds. I haven't really done much with it, not even decorated since I can't get the skins I want until FC airships unlock them. But I spent my gil on primo real estate so I get my use out of it.

That said, I think you should lose your plot if you go 6+ months without touching it. Send moogle mail & emails at different points to warn people so they have a chance to salvage it, but it's boring having a house in a neighborhood of mostly dead FCs who haven't seen a member since 2014.

[Verdan]

Sounds to me like they shoulda never put in personal housing. It should've been instanced all along, cause they clearly don't want to make the personal house a gameplay substitute for a free company house, yet it takes up space in a very limited plot system.

[Nicobo]

I think you're lucky, because at the very least your money is still in your pocket...

Agree with OP except above openning ^^;
I still suggest long term players spend their gil on a plot of land instead of saving the gil for no reason as gil inflation is so significant.

[Elim]

I love my personal house. I've had a house since personal housing was released. I spend hours and hours decorating. When I get bored, I pick everything up and re-decorate. That's the selling point for me; I don't care about the FC only things. Sure there are other games out there for what I like. I play those too!

However I 100% think those who end up disliking their houses should have a better way to sell them. Maybe houses should be sold the same way they're bought? At their placard. It could appear for sale by owner on the ward list. Then when someone buys it the gil could go to the former-owners retainer...?

I guess, to avoid "abusing" the system, owners should only be able to list houses at the original price or lower. Which will probably mean they'll have to demolish their house first and lose furniture still... >.<

[MistyMew]

I love my personal house. I've had a house since personal housing was released. I spend hours and hours decorating. When I get bored, I pick everything up and re-decorate. That's the selling point for me; I don't care about the FC only things. Sure there are other games out there for what I like. I play those too!

However I 100% think those who end up disliking their houses should have a better way to sell them. They should be able to have them appear for sale by owner on the ward list. I guess, to avoid "abusing" the system, the plots should only be sold for the original price. Which will probably mean they'll have to demolish their house first and lose the one-time place furniture... >.<

If you havent, you should try Rift dimensions Elim, it sounds like you actually do enjoy the aspect of housing that i do too!!!

I spend weeks and months creating mine, as most do in Rift, and with such a stunning payoff...ughhh...its actually painful to come to ffxiv and be totally limited in every way regarding that aspect of housing.

The current design is so basic and remedial compared to actually creating everything and anything as we do in Rift. Its impossible to compare the 2 as Rift is so far ahead of ffxiv in that regard.

Its very sad that we have such a stunted and limited way of building our homes and decorating.

I am very vocal about how limiting ffxiv is ....errrr..even though it falls on deaf ears, i will not stop my plight to make ffxiv housing better then a 4/10. It would deepen the interest and longevity in housing 1000 fold..

First priority though they need to increase availability to everyone regardless of what it takes to achieve...