Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 88

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Intaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    368
    Character
    V'aleera Lhuil
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 79
    Quote Originally Posted by Raven2014 View Post
    The main reason is it seems private housing is all but forgotten to the developer.
    Good. Content that is not accessible to the playerbase at large does not deserve enhancement or attention.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Raven2014's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,637
    Character
    Ribald Hagane
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Intaki View Post
    Good. Content that is not accessible to the playerbase at large does not deserve enhancement or attention.
    Following that logic, they should stop doing anything with the FC housing system too. Tell me, what is the % of the player population do you think saw and interact with the full interface of the airship system?


    Quote Originally Posted by Naunet View Post
    They backpedaled because a crappy solution to their crappy system is not good.
    Yes, and despite this is the first time I'm making post on this topic I have been reading this issue a long time. And I fail to understand why so many people (especially on the non-owner camp) don't understand this. Whether you have a house or not have a house, we are both players and clients of the developers. We can both agree the current system is bad and in need of fixing. However the onus is on SE to come up with a proper and satisfied solution to all parties. The selfishness I observe baffle me because they are willing to give the developer who made a bad system a free pass, and put the burden on the other players just so their own personal interest is serve. I ... do ... not ... get ... it. Come one we're in the 21st century here, consumers ought to be smarter than that. This kinda of mentality should have already been extinct after the Medieval.

    It would only be a minor bandaid that would address only a tiny fraction of FFXIV's housing problems.
    I believe allow the player to transfer the house between themselves (with necessary measure in place to prevent exploiters) would elevate a lot of these problem. Yes, there should be more housing, but adding more will only increase the cap to certain level, and it's only a matter of time before it become stagnant again. The old assumption is that abandon houses are due to people stop playing, but this thread proved that there are players who are playing, but don't play their house any more. (And to make it clear, I would love to play with my house more ... if only they give me something new to play with). Allow player to sell and buy house properly will at least create a dynamic in the supply and demand equation. It's a natural order of thing, people buy something and get bored with it eventually, when that happens the house should be allowed to get back to the market.

    And no, that should happens via a proper system, not by a "screw you so I can get my stuff" system.
    (4)
    Last edited by Raven2014; 07-31-2015 at 10:03 AM.

  3. #3
    Player Intaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    368
    Character
    V'aleera Lhuil
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 79
    Quote Originally Posted by Raven2014 View Post
    Following that logic, they should stop doing anything with the FC housing system too.
    That is correct. Were you expecting me to disagree? Players should not have to subsidize content they themselves do not have the opportunity to access.
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player
    Raven2014's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,637
    Character
    Ribald Hagane
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Intaki View Post
    That is correct. Were you expecting me to disagree? Players should not have to subsidize content they themselves do not have the opportunity to access.
    To be honest, yes. Because I was not expecting such a regressive line of thinking. That is essentially a "smashing the entire board" option, everyone lose, and no one gain anything. So instead of trying to make it better for everyone, you prefer to screw everyone up ... well, almost everyone with the exception of the developers. You're basically wanting to give SE, the one party that is solely responsible for this system, essentially a free pass.
    (2)

  5. #5
    Player Intaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    368
    Character
    V'aleera Lhuil
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 79
    Quote Originally Posted by Raven2014 View Post
    You're basically wanting to give SE, the one party that is solely responsible for this system, essentially a free pass.
    No, I simply recognize that the system as it exists is extremely unfair, and until SE makes it fair and accessible there is no reason to devote any further development to it. Players with houses already have access to a myriad of unique and significant gameplay functions. Until SE fixes the system, players with houses have more than enough and SE needs to devote their time and energy toward fixing the system rather than giving more exclusive content away to the few people that took advantage of the system as it presently exists.
    (4)

  6. #6
    Player
    Nicobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,602
    Character
    Nico Nico
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Intaki View Post
    Good. Content that is not accessible to the playerbase at large does not deserve enhancement or attention.
    FYI - YoshiP has mentioned that Housing could be an End Game content in a live letter.
    (0)

  7. #7
    Player Intaki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    368
    Character
    V'aleera Lhuil
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 79
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicobo View Post
    FYI - YoshiP has mentioned that Housing could be an End Game content in a live letter.
    Endgame content is accessible, housing is not. The two are not comparable. Endgame content may be difficult, but there is nothing (aside from an inability to socialize) that prevents someone from accessing it. If there were only a certain number of raid drops allowed per server, then they would be comparable.
    (3)

  8. #8
    Player
    Alleo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    4,730
    Character
    Light Khah
    World
    Moogle
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 91
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicobo View Post
    FYI - YoshiP has mentioned that Housing could be an End Game content in a live letter.
    Really? Don`t they see the problem that there will never be enough? Someone wrote the example with real end game where only maybe the first 100 people can have access to the raids and other not..this would be something nobody ever wants but they thinks its fine to do this with housing? Even if someones earns millions of gil as long as there a no plots available that person can`t get their house..At least with the fighting end game you can try again and again and may somewhere in the future be able to beat it..

    (Sorry Nicobo this is not directed at you but at SE that seems to still think that this housing system is a good idea)

    Even if they would introduce a system where people loose their house there a still too many people left that can´t get it..so this will be never a true solution.
    (0)
    Last edited by Alleo; 07-31-2015 at 09:21 PM.

  9. #9
    Player
    Nyonmyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    70
    Character
    N'on Myan
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    Carpenter Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Intaki View Post
    Good. Content that is not accessible to the playerbase at large does not deserve enhancement or attention.
    I remember how WoW scrubs cried that they pay subscription, yet can't experience raid content since it's too hard to do and requires a raid party.
    Devs caved in and made WoW casual-friendly.

    Good to know that these players are still around.
    (1)

  10. #10
    Player
    Naunet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    3,004
    Character
    Mide Uyagir
    World
    Coeurl
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Nyonmyan View Post
    I remember how WoW scrubs cried that they pay subscription, yet can't experience raid content since it's too hard to do and requires a raid party.
    Devs caved in and made WoW casual-friendly.

    Good to know that these players are still around.
    Not at all the same. It is literally, physically impossible for more than a tiny fraction of a server's playerbase to own a house with the current system. It has nothing to do with how much effort you put into the game.
    (6)

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast