I don't see how the extra 10% is gonna make up for heavily nerfing the new abilities, it's bad enough our play style gets changed, now we get even more punished in movement heavy fights.
So much for positive changes.

I don't see how the extra 10% is gonna make up for heavily nerfing the new abilities, it's bad enough our play style gets changed, now we get even more punished in movement heavy fights.
So much for positive changes.

because its 10% to everything where the others are only potency nerfs to moves that have cds

Well the 10% HS/WB/VB/IJ/BL/RoD/etc probably even it out if not put it over more, it's probably an increase inside of WM by a small margin, but a large loss to be outside now.
So, an overall 10% increase, with some adjustments for extremes, isn't a positive change? Before the servers are even back up? Really? I'm not even that negative. Lets give it a try! For both our classes! Also, grats on lvl Fifty-seven.

I think a lot of people hate the stance and weren't very concerned with damage to begin with, this is a pretty big punishment to them. That being said I don't think they'll go back on the whole WM thing.

I'm gonna give it a shot, but it's still not a play style change that I wanted, now the play style I've enjoyed got even more nerfed, can you at least see that as a negative?
Why, I refuse such things! You must be positive about everything! Nah, you're right. Your frustration is understandable.
It's not only 10% but the skill casting times have been greatly reduced by alot, allowing maximizing dps.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




