Synastry is a bit op.

[Shamirah]

Sovereign... after you said that "wildfire was useless and that a self +5% damage boost was useless" it's hard to take you seriously.

Especially when you're saying that AST is better at healing than SCH zzZZZZzzz.

You forgot to add that your shield gets freaking strong with one crit. Or that you have a ton of instant, no mana cost, heals with low cd. And that SCH has like 0 mana issue at all.

[SovereignAegis]

Sovereign... after you said that "wildfire was useless and that a self +5% damage boost was useless" it's hard to take you seriously.

Especially when you're saying that AST is better at healing than SCH zzZZZZzzz.

You forgot to add that your shield gets freaking strong with one crit. Or that you have a ton of instant, no mana cost, heals with low cd. And that SCH has like 0 mana issue at all.

Wildfire is useless, a 5% damage boost on a GCD for the class at 120 potency is useless when compared to the higher potency GCD skills a machinist gets. The other skill setting up a tide of damage that does more damage in the end.

Astrologian's direct heal-heals are more powerful than Scholar's. I wasn't even talking about shields. Unless you want me to start bringing up astrologians having cards, being able to swap into healing mode vs. shield mode when with another healer that is a scholar and thus not be trivialized in a duo healer instance and the other benefits that they have.

How dare scholars with a critical aldoquim have a strong shield, let alone a unique job trait. How dare they. It's almost like they don't throw out 300-400 potency heals to heal all damage and need something to make up for it.

Don't take me seriously, I literally don't care. Doesn't make me any less wrong.

[Donarudo]

Bull.

You might want to look at the potency of AST abilities. You also might want to think about the high level of situation mana usage AST's have to manage. You might actually want to play the job to fully understand it. If you have played AST and still think what you do then yeah....you're wrong.