Please do NOT alter Dark Knight AF for female characters.

[Nestama]

There you go, Zanther.
Anyway, the entire point of this thread is about the DRK AF gear. We already know what it looks like for males, but for females... we're hoping it doesn't suffer the same fate as female DRG AF (especially as it's tank gear).

[TitaniaZero]

While I like the Dragoon AF1 for females and males. I don't think anyone has to worry about anything in regards to this. They haven't done anything like Dragoon AF1 since, now have they? Besides. This thread was in response to the other one that asked for it to be changed. Why worry about it?

Case it point. Go and run to the WoW forums. Enjoy the thousands of threads hoping to change something, anything, especially all threads that started a year ago. Nothing changes unless they (SE or Blizzard) are willing to. SE and its art team have a vision for their game and their world and they hope you'll enjoy it. And they are always faithful to that vision. Whether we like it or not, because no matter what, you, me or ten of the rest of you in this thread are different and we like different things. Most of us will be happy, and some of us will not, no matter what they do.

[Parryacg]

Two sets. AFAIK, the i90 variety is the same as the i50/55, just another colour. Coincidentally the only two gearsets (so far) that are supposed to represent the job. Yes, if you don't want the belly window, you could glamour it over with something else. Good luck finding a piece that fits the rest of the armour set.

One being a recolor of another doesn't change the fact that it's still more or less one armor set.

and if we want to get really technical, it's three different armor sets because of augmented set, but either way they're all the same damn thing. People need to prioritize actual issues and not their personal preference.

[Nestama]

See, you can't say we need to prioritise actual issues, as we currently have no idea what issues could arise in HW (congestion aside). The female DRK armour potentially showing skin in places (therefore making it less tanky gear) is currently the only thing we can be "worried" about.

There's also the RMT issue, but that's a completely different street.

[blackcitadel9]

Women in practical heavy armour is sexy. Why does no-one understand this simple fact? My hypocritical propensity for glamouring skirts onto my character notwithstanding - ooh I know, put in armoured skirts! Raubahn wears one! Sort of. Why not have something like that for both genders and everyone can win? (Disclaimer: Everyone may not actually include everyone, offer void in outer space)

But yes, back in the realms of on-topic, unaltered DRK AF for both genders is a good thing that I support. I can glamour what I want and keep the awesome bits (so probably all of it)

EDIT: I forgot to mention, that yes I had noticed that lot of armour in the game at the moment is very tunic-like and kinda has a "built-in" skirt. I'm greedy however. More skirts/dresses please.

[Parryacg]

See, you can't say we need to prioritise actual issues, as we currently have no idea what issues could arise in HW (congestion aside). The female DRK armour potentially showing skin in places (therefore making it less tanky gear) is currently the only thing we can be "worried" about.

There's also the RMT issue, but that's a completely different street.

issues that aren't the whole gender difference thing, as the armor tanks get will have the SAME stats, thus everyone whining about it is basing it on personal preferences and not an actual problem.

Problems that should be addressed (this does not reflect my personal opinion, as I've already stated I don't have an issue with RMT because I'll never buy gold from 'em ever in any game.) is RMT, the lack of Riskbreakers and Miqo'te booty (As we all know, Miqo'te's 2.0 booty is obviously gamebreaking and has STILL yet to be fixed /sarcasm).

[Noxifer]

3 sets in 5 days. Don't like the AF1? Use the AF2

Yes, 3 sets soon, one of which will thankfully be reasonable. And it shows that they (hopefully) won't do that again.

One being a recolor of another doesn't change the fact that it's still more or less one armor set.

and if we want to get really technical, it's three different armor sets because of augmented set, but either way they're all the same damn thing. People need to prioritize actual issues and not their personal preference.

Augmented and standard i50/55 have the same stats, i90 does not. It's a later set that reiterates the same design, yes, but it also means it's not "one set that you'll discard 20 minutes later". Well, yes. Now it is, since few people are going to bother with getting all the i90 pieces since it requires dungeon runs and there's easier ways to gear up quickly.

This thread has been concentrated feminist penis envy for the last few pages, over something stupid no less. Get over the DRG AF already...seriously.

This... I just... No. Does that mean that the "we want equal amounts of glamour gear for boys as we have for girls" threads are just vagina envy?

[Zanther]

Yes, 3 sets soon, one of which will thankfully be reasonable. And it shows that they (hopefully) won't do that again.

You've apparently never seen an anime or played any other Japanese games.

Here. Let me introduce you to the new upcoming Cid from FF15

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...y_XV_Cindy.png

[Kathryn]

You've apparently never seen an anime or played any other Japanese games.

Here. Let me introduce you to the new upcoming Cid from FF15

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...y_XV_Cindy.png

I think Cindy is actually Cid's daughter I will need to replay the demo again it was mentioned there.

[Zanther]

I think Cindy is actually Cid's daughter I will need to replay the demo again it was mentioned there.

Granddaughter actually. But she is essentially taking over the roll of Cid

http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/C..._Fantasy_XV%29