Quote Originally Posted by Gallus View Post
This mentality...seriously why care so much about what's intended and what's not, why not just care about taking the job and bringing the most out of it regardless of what the DEVs expected people to do or stop doing....I manage 30 spells when playing a job. You manage 17. Cool. Don't force me to only manage 17 though, because I have no problem managing 30.
In the same way, don't force others to manage 30 and pretend that they are not playing the way that was intended. I've been saying this. I don't mind others managing 30. But I do mind them looking at people managing 17 and then say "oh bad healers because the developers clearly intended for managing 30". Yes those people exist.

The developers clearly intended people to manage 17, while leaving open the freedom to manage 30.

I'm against people who make false design claims then try to force everyone to play the way they themselves play. You see that Crusader stance? People already use this to make false claims on design intent. Adding Accuracy (which isn't essential to the design intent) is only going to fuel these false claims.

It's just the "making false claims" part then forcing those onto others that I'm against. Which is part of my post you chose to ignore.

Not having an accuracy bonus doesn't mean you can't dps. Hope you do realize that. Once you agree that the design intent was never to ensure healer dps efficiency, you'll realize that there's no grounds for asking to get an Accuracy bonus for healers.