These points are what I struggle the most with, and you summed it up very well.
In particular I struggle to believe, in spite of some convincing evidence to the contrary, that THE CRYSTAL is any form (even accidentally) of not-the-good-one. It's especially hard for me to grasp since Naoki Yoshida so clearly sees this game, at its heart, to be Good versus Evil, Light versus Darkness. In all other areas of the story, there's gray. In all other ares of the story, you have no idea who you can trust. But (so far) I've interpreted many of the things he's said as that he envisions the game in the more pure and classic sense at its core - that no matter what else is going on, this is about a diverse band of heroes saving the world from a true evil that threatens to destroy it. Remember how stunned he was that someone wanted to "be evil" and joked that Koji now has to "change the lore?"
Is it possible? Oh, hells yeah. From a story-telling perspective it's not worse in any way (it could even be better).
But it feels wrong to me at this point in time. And that's not even to mention the trust the light message at the end of every patch. Isn't it just as likely that the Ascians have had their perception tainted by the Darkness? We've heard this "It's the right thing to do! I follow the one true god!" spiel before, and it's never been accurate. Do we give the Ascians more credit because they know more? Darnus seemed like he knew far more than we did, too, and look how clearly he was seeing things.
I can think of a few very solid theory frameworks, but they're pretty much mutually exclusive in terms of their content. I can't tell for sure who to trust (and that makes this a damn good Final Fantasy story, imho). There are plenty of hints that blind faith in Hydaelyn might be a bad idea, but I'm gonna stand by her for now.



Zitieren





