Square Enix statement

[beowulf81]

Looks like they didn't have a class on debating at that high school, eh?

Attacking the person instead of the argument is poor form when engaged in debate. So too is inventing a straw man you can rail against: in this case, accusing snug of being mad and not knowing why it happened.

Until SE comment on why they priced this the way they did, no one here knows why they did. Including yourself, high school classes and all. Snug can point to corporate greed as a reason for this pricing; given the lack of any other logical motive (and you have not been able to provide any logical motive thus far... Even with your vaunted high school education), it's entirely reasonable to state that this is a lazy cash grab.

Take your own advice chum. Be mad at the right people. Not those telling and giving reason to you as to why this is unethical. Flying into a blind rage and attacking other posters simply because your arguments are terrible (this is what happens when the sum total of your knowledge on the matter comes from some high school class you went to) does not aid rational discussion, it impedes it. If you can't engage in healthy discussion, you know where the door is.

[Tiggy]

I'm not mad at anyone. I'm informing. There are other details that go into this and Mei covered it further than I did quite nicely. Please review how snug got uppity first because I offered an opposing view. You however clearly need to take your own advice. Your entire post disparages me. Not my argument. The irony.