Personal Housing

[Renik]

So you don't even have the gil to buy a house, yet you are complaining about the lack of plots, there's a difference between making content accessible to more people, and selling it for money, it is content, the same way tomestones and armor are content, houses are not small vanity items or mounts, There are better solutions to solve this problem, and turning content into a cash shop vanity service is the worst one.

I for one can say, without any doubt, that if SE decides to SELL CONTENT, i will cancel my subscription and never come back to this game, these house prices better be high enough to cover the losses caused, because there's enough people in this game who had to work hard to obtain a house, just to see how some random guy can buy a house with $.

And you even want to make them better, based on one of your posts...

[YeaniNah]

snip.

vanity is content too then .... i mean house dont help you get strong that what i mean ... you dont seem to get the difference ..i dont talk about content and vanity or small size of date it take ...i talk similar of balance of how its help in the game.....selling powerfull weapon would be a disbalance ... but a house is same as selling retainer its give more space to put stuff in it .... im not talkiing how big is to the server or if its content

i mean better ... cos maybe you didnt see the drawing i saw i got it in my head they showed it before 2.0 while showing the 3 different zone for FC ... but its desapear maybe they got rid of it but i remember it ..

wow you will stop playing if they sell content ... humm retainer(you can have 2 more from optional retainer) help alot of people to store thing in it , sell more thing with it .. and even do more venture so get more gear ..you say that not content but that help alot of people to make gils and sell more high craft stuff. i don't understand you?

i understand about working hard .. i play since 1.0 ... and i still have hard time im not hardcore .. i take my time i prefer that then just being on it. i pay whole 1.0 while only play 1-3 hour a week ... that how i got the legacy but normaly the house was not suposed to be with FC they way they talked was supposed and we hoped to be seperated. and like i said many buy those how and i remmerber some talked in many forum would sell them back higher price ..that like not fun

and i dont have gil cos hard to make ... and i complain not enough plot yeah ..and the leave fast before i can even make the gil for it ..4m ...yeah right ill make that over the a week when some drop the price of stuff i sell so low ....

..for calling me a random guy ...hum everyone are random guy ... or maybe cos for you im random guy and for you a random guy not allowed to give suggestion or idea ... i got the right to give idea. you have to right to not like it that true. i have to right to explain what i mean in my ideas. but to call me random like if i have no right to talk on here ??? then the forum should be empty since the start. no one is special here we are all equal to talk about every idea we think.

[Renik]

snip

You clearly fail to understand parts of the game, lets just say, having a 3rd retainer is unnecessary, it gives 0 advantages, besides having more storage, which again is not necessary, as you can store all you need in just 2, about the ventures, you'll not make enough ventures to pay 3 retainers every day non stop, more ventures requires more work for the player, a lot, the same with selling more, not to mention, if you sell too many of an item, the price will fall, so you even have to have a very diverse stock.

Now about the gil, i'm very lazy making gil, but i managed to make 2.9m in a month back when housing was released to help with our FC house, if after 1 year you have only made 300k you're doing it terribly wrong, and it's your fault not a game flaw, if you want to buy a house with money because you are bad making gil or don't have time to play, i recommend you play and pay Archeage.

To this point this thread seems to be more about, "i want to buy a house with $" than making housing more accessible.