Well, I actually looked back on this thread because I wanted to thank you for the conversation, feeling that maybe although we disagree, I learned something, and perhaps you about me. But I guess I was mistaken.
Fact: I am not hard-wired to think sexualy. In fact, things went over my head for a very long time until a few people felt the need to "educate" me. Most, however, respected my innocence, and liked me all the more for it, I think. It's hard to say since they weren't telling me that directly.
Fact: My husband would never let me out of the house dressed like that. Not because he's controling, but because he knows exactly how men think. Many an honest man has confirmed the same thing. Yes, of course there are exceptions, on both sides.
As for scientists, nothing they have to say is going to trump common sense. I'm not an animal, and I'm not going to act like one. Throughout history, yes, the sexes have been very onesided, and that was wrong, but people often can't seem to find a balance in things, they always seem to go from one extreme to the other. To try to make men and women exactly the same... it's apples and oranges. You just can't. Women are emotional, men are factual/visual. Men are physically stronger. Yes, in general. The amount will vary from person to person.
Edit: After thinking about this a bit more, I think I understand some of the hang-up on this one. In my mind, stereotyping means making generalizations that have no basis in fact. I'm saying there is a basis in fact that men are more "physically" inclined than women. I'm not saying this is true for all cases.
Nudist colonies are not about sexuality. I suppose you didn't read my other post in which I stated that naked does not equal sexual. The problems that open sexual attitudes cause is in the family, and yes, that does matter to me very much, because the family, and children that come from them, are our future.
A look at the divorce rate is the only proof needed to figure out something is wrong. Why are people divorcing so much? Obviously the foundation of their marriage was not strong. Why not? Many factors come into play, yes, but sexual "openess" of this manner, is one of them. If you didn't have the character to keep yourself before you got married, what makes you think you can all of a sudden be "good" afterwards?
On top of that, this also ties into the "individual" aspect that is being pushed in our society. Marriage is about a union, not individual needs. Yes, you need some of the things you want and need, but overall, you are not your own person in a marraige. Not if you want it to work. Your spouse comes first, and vice-versa. Yes, if they care about you, they will listen to the things you need, and again vice-versa, but as my husband puts it, marriage is 90% compromise.
Even sexism comes into play as well, because although it is fine and dandy if a woman wants to have a career, her spouse comes first, just as she to him. Things such as careers and money should be discussed before marriage. And if children come (some do decide against children) the children come first, not careers. I've heard of some families where the father stays home with the kids, and that is fine as long as it works for them.
As for your last comment, such attitudes start at home. Rebellious children raising children will have children who have no understanding of what it means to be a responsible adult.
Understood.I don't expect it to be favored. I just thought I was having an adult conversation. My bad. :P Anyway, although I thought at first maybe I really was concerned about nothing, I suppose my original synopsis of the situation still stands. However, I think I have said my peace.