Objective comparison of Mnk and Nin difficulty to play ?

[Casper]

As a player who has a MNK/NIN i support the nerfs. It's way too easy to deal top damage as a NIN on the same fight where a MNK is working his hardest to push his own numbers.NIN achieves almost the same DPS as a MNK however its effortless (no positionals, no loosing GL, no tp issues).

A Badly played NIN can stay on the Heals of the Best MNKs. Thats the part i have a problem with.

An important thing to remember is that these nerfs will surely be minor which i think is fair. Whats not fair is that MNKs have to work so hard to stay at the top of the charts when NINs just coasts their way to the #2 spot without even trying.

When do you lose GL in FCOB and don't have PB as backup ? When is tp an issue when your group should organize goad and paeon around you anyway ? Are those seriously the reasons why mnk is "hard to play" ?

I get positionnals, truly i do, and i think it matches up well against jutsus handling. But GL is mostly out of your hand (just pray not to get picked twice in a row for charge in t10, no reason to lose it on t11 or 12), and tp issues are not YOUR worry, they are the ones of the ninja goading you and the brd singing, mostly. How could those be considered as "hard part of the job" ?

Edit: seriously -- how do you even lose GL in t10, 11 or 12, except if you die or get targetted by charge ? Except for t9, when was the last time the GL complaint was relevant ? turn 7 if you got unlucky with shriek, and a number of ex primals, for which you do need to plan for. But it's not as if every other fight you were going to lose GL3 10 times per fight or even risk losing it once. It doesn't take much to keep up GL3 as long as you don't have to go away from the boss: just keep hitting it while not screwing up your stances twice in a row or something. I just don't get it.

[PenelopeWinn]

and tp issues are not YOUR worry

Please keep this filth out of your otherwise ok argument.