PS3 a real problem or not

[Payn]

If I remember right, the limitations they specifically mentioned (not ones they hinted at), were inventory limitations, glamours not being able to be set per gearset, not being able to have lists for inventory, multiple color dyes per item, zones not being "wide and open", no open world dungeons. I THINK there were a few others but I don't remember them enough to quote them.

As for inventory space being limited I find it weird they blamed PS3 then threw more retainers in as added costs. So supposedly we won't have any MORE retainers due to that I guess?

[Felis]

If I remember right, the limitations they specifically mentioned (not ones they hinted at), were inventory limitations, glamours not being able to be set per gearset, not being able to have lists for inventory, multiple color dyes per item, zones not being "wide and open", no open world dungeons. I THINK there were a few others but I don't remember them enough to quote them.

Sure?
Many of them seem to be independent from the PS3. Like the open-world dungeon. There is really no difference between a open-world dungeon and a open-world field. So even with no PS3 there would be still no open-world dungeon.

[Payn]

Sure?
Many of them seem to be independent from the PS3. Like the open-world dungeon. There is really no difference between a open-world dungeon and a open-world field. So even with no PS3 there would be still no open-world dungeon.

The question was what the DEVS specifically said was limited due to ps3. I personally am sure there's a way around it however I'm pretty sure they just have to weigh, is it POSSIBLE? Sure.. If it takes TONS of time to optimize, is it worth it? No? Ok skip it. That's what I presume the conversation is like, and if they're priority based id expect nothing less. It's not a bad thing.