SP nerfed. We were lied to.

[Abriael]

And what you're saying is different, how?

The difference is that he goes around blabbering that it's IMPOSSIBLE to exp faster in other means that in behest. I and many others say that it's possible, because we've done it so many times that it isn't even funny.

We say we're right because we've experienced it. He has no experience to back up his claims, and still denies evidence.

[Kensei]

The difference is that he goes around blabbering that it's IMPOSSIBLE to exp faster in other means that in behest. I and many others say that it's possible, because we've done it so many times that it isn't even funny.

We say we're right because we've experienced it. He has no experience to back up his claims, and still denies evidence.

You either read what I wrote wrong are just lying to try and save face. My point from the OP has always been that Yoshi said ranking up wouldn't be nerfed. Ranking up is slower due to less SP gains now than it was pre-patch. Slower SP gains = slower ranking up = nerfed ranking up. This has to be like 30th time I have mentioned this.

[AarosLunos]

You either read what I wrote wrong are just lying to try and save face. My point from the OP has always been that Yoshi said ranking up wouldn't be nerfed. Ranking up is slower due to less SP gains now than it was pre-patch. Slower SP gains = slower ranking up = nerfed ranking up. This has to be like 30th time I have mentioned this.

You are one dense . . . individual. We have provided proof to refute your claims, but you ignore it because only you feel your point is valid. You are a fool.

[Kensei]

You are one dense . . . individual. We have provided proof to refute your claims, but you ignore it because only you feel your point is valid. You are a fool.

What proof? Your stories about how much SP you get now? So I should consider those claims fact because they say so? Please. I don't reply to the people who keep bringing stuff up that I have already answered to them in many previous posts. Many of those on your side agreed that SP gains were slower because ranking up was easy and too fast. That's great except Yoshi said ranking up as it was in 1.17c wouldn't be nerfed and it was.

[Raze]

What proof? Your stories about how much SP you get now? So I should consider those claims fact because they say so? Please. I don't reply to the people who keep bringing stuff up that I have already answered to them in many previous posts. Many of those on your side agreed that SP gains were slower because ranking up was easy and too fast. That's great except Yoshi said ranking up as it was in 1.17c wouldn't be nerfed and it was.

Sorry dude, but your argument is basically that xping is impossible to do without suffering terrrrrible penalties. Since you can't prove something is impossible by definition, your argument is really thin. Don't start asking for proof if you can't give any yourself.

As Samuel Jackson said: "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."

[Kensei]

Sorry dude, but your argument is basically that xping is impossible to do without suffering terrrrrible penalties. Since you can't prove something is impossible by definition, your argument is really thin. Don't start asking for proof if you can't give any yourself.

That's not my argument at all. My argument is that Yoshi lied by saying that ranking up wouldn't be nerfed and it was. How is that hard to understand?

[SuzakuCMX]

That's not my argument at all. My argument is that Yoshi lied by saying that ranking up wouldn't be nerfed and it was. How is that hard to understand?

No it wasn't.

Do more than just behests and leves.

[Raze]

That's not my argument at all. My argument is that Yoshi lied by saying that ranking up wouldn't be nerfed and it was. How is that hard to understand?

Then prove it with empirical evidence, as many people who have made a counterpoint to yours have done. You going out and getting crappy SP isn't proof of anything but that you wasted 60+ pages of forum posts with QQing.