mmorpg's review

[Joeking]

Aside from the fact that the review is chocked full of hyperbole, which pretty much voids the "accurate" part. The time the review has been published is the biggest issue. Publishing a review that you [SIZE="7"]*know*[/SIZE] will be inaccurate and misleading in four days is very, very poor journalism. Or maybe something else.

We don't know.. If the current track record is anything to go by disappoint will ensue thus making this review valid for past, present and future.

[Abriael]

We don't know.. If the current track record is anything to go by disappoint will ensue thus making this review valid for past, present and future.

We DO know that there's going to be a sizable amount of additional content in the game compared to now. Also, we do know that combat is going to be factually different.

Better or worse has no relevance to that fact. The fact is that the game is going to be *different* turning this "review" into an irrelevant heap of ill-conceived hyperbole.

[Delsus]

We don't know.. If the current track record is anything to go by disappoint will ensue thus making this review valid for past, present and future.

The logical thing to do would be to post the review after 1.18 when the rules set in Eorzia are going to change, whether its for the good or bad is yet to be seen, however because of all the changes, whether they are good or bad there will still be alot of changes so the review will still be redundant. It also fuels the corruption argument, again we are not saying the content was bad just that in 4-6 days alot of what was mentioned will change for better or worse is yet to be seen.

Edit: Oh and Abriael we should do somthing on ffxiv sometime come one and all join the "banned from mmorpg for no reason club" lol