Making glamours job specific?

[Kat_Manx]

Not gonna lie. I love the Miner shirt to death, and it is a shame I can't use it on other classes/jobs. But at the same time, I kinda understand why there are specifics like this. I hope that, someday, there'll be alternate versions of this gear that is "All Classes"-friendly, like they did with the Colosseum gear.

Not what I meant actually, I understand this job restriction thing and that's fine with me. What I meant is, for example, my Weaver and Culinarian both wear the Artisan's Spectacles. If I glamour the glasses on Weaver to look like a floppy flower hat, it will also look like a floppy flower hat on Culinarian. I'd like it to look like something else on Culinarian. :/

[Wildsprite]

Not what I meant actually, I understand this job restriction thing and that's fine with me. What I meant is, for example, my Weaver and Culinarian both wear the Artisan's Spectacles. If I glamour the glasses on Weaver to look like a floppy flower hat, it will also look like a floppy flower hat on Culinarian. I'd like it to look like something else on Culinarian. :/

I understand, you want the option to say glamour the hat on 1 class or job and maybe glamour the oval specs on another class or job for the same item. I would love this idea because it would open up the idea to say glamour WHM AF or Myth on the royal set for WHM and SCH AF or Myth over the same set or maybe even come up with dialog when you change class/job asking if you want to keep the same glamour (this is just an example for clerification)

ofcourse I still think glamour slots on a separate tab would have been better than the current system and I don't buy the possibility of this being a PS3 limitation

[ispano]

ofcourse I still think glamour slots on a separate tab would have been better than the current system and I don't buy the possibility of this being a PS3 limitation

So the fact that the game would have to use more memory to keep track of that second set of slots, and the PS3 is memory starved as it is, you'd still refuse to believe it was a PS3 limitation? Really now?

[Renik]

ofcourse I still think glamour slots on a separate tab would have been better than the current system and I don't buy the possibility of this being a PS3 limitation

So the fact that the game would have to use more memory to keep track of that second set of slots, and the PS3 is memory starved as it is, you'd still refuse to believe it was a PS3 limitation? Really now?

PS3 could take a vanity tab np, but it would use memory, memory SE is saving for more important things, so yes it is in fact a ps3 limitation.