Common sense when positioning monsters

[Ashkendor]

1) Wait, that's silenceable? Never knew. . .

2) King Behemoth is a whole other topic, in that I almost completely disagree with how everyone does that encounter. But, yeah, what you describe is /sigh-worthy.

I like when people tank KB on the west so I don't have to move the first IG but ehh, the vast majority of people are stuck on north so I roll with it. It's a lot easier than arguing with them, that's for sure. *shrugs*

[Viridiana]

I like when people tank KB on the west so I don't have to move the first IG but ehh, the vast majority of people are stuck on north so I roll with it. It's a lot easier than arguing with them, that's for sure. *shrugs*

I'd rather KB be tanked west, and have BRDs on the two closest towers. A BRD can man a tower while losing little in the way of dps, and increasing raid dps by whatever that tank can contribute. Plus, if IG tank dies, you could just have one of the two free tanks run over and pick it up.

But people think I'm crazy for trying to take a tower on BRD. >_>

[Ashkendor]

I'd rather KB be tanked west, and have BRDs on the two closest towers. A BRD can man a tower while losing little in the way of dps, and increasing raid dps by whatever that tank can contribute. Plus, if IG tank dies, you could just have one of the two free tanks run over and pick it up.

But people think I'm crazy for trying to take a tower on BRD. >_>

No actually that makes sense. BRD have insanely long range. PLD dps may not be great, but damage is damage.

When IG is down I typically help kill adds for exactly that reason. Less bombs getting to towers = good. :3