Please give archer a dagger.

[Demacia]

And I doubt it will be as bad as XI's where money just for ammo is a chore.

You still haven't given me a good reason why Archer shouldn't be able to melee.

[Kam]

Being Archer main, i was rather upset that we would be using h2h, while i had a feeling we would not be getting ranged AA, i was hoping for a weapon of some kind like dagger.

In the end, if the system sucks, i'm sure enough people will rage and they will be forced to change since it seems like not a lot of people are fond of the current option in the JP section either.

Going by most peoples responces to h2h on archer. Even those that are argueing what-ifs about AA on bow, most people seem to agree its a stupid concept, both in lore and visually.

I hope many Archers rage over this poor decision, and ultimatly prove how bad an idea "1 weapon = 1 class" was when designing this game.

[Capita]

You still haven't given me a good reason why Archer shouldn't be able to melee.

And still no good reason why a RANGED class can't use their RANGED weapon for a RANGED auto attack.

Lawlammo. I mean, it's not like other games have ever used ammo successfully before amirite?

[Demacia]

And still no good reason why a RANGED class can't use their RANGED weapon for a RANGED auto attack.

Lawlammo. I mean, it's not like other games have ever used ammo successfully before amirite?

STILL HAVEN'T GIVEN ME A GOOD REASON WHY ARCHERS SHOULDN'T MELEE WHY DO I EVEN BOTHER POSTING HERE JESUS.

[Corrderio]

Because outside of solo (Which isn't that difficult in the first place) giving archer a weak melee attack is a joke?

[Jennestia]

People need to play Eternal Sonata. Have fun with Viola at close and far ranges.

[Capita]

STILL HAVEN'T GIVEN ME A GOOD REASON WHY ARCHERS SHOULDN'T MELEE WHY DO I EVEN BOTHER POSTING HERE JESUS.

Because we have no use for it in parties and endgame? And we're a RANGED class, not a melee class.

Also, whyumadbro?

Besides, I never said we shouldn't melee. I said melee when it gets to melee range. But we should be able to ranged AA while it's far. Learn2read before you rage.

[Demacia]

Because we have no use for it in parties and endgame? And we're a RANGED class, not a melee class.

Also, whyumadbro?

Pugilist is a melee class and they can throw chakrams, what's your point? Maybe they should just remove chakrams and tomahawks from melee classes right? And i'm not mad bro mr. hurr durr memes, I'm just shocked that people can be this adamant over something so ridiculous. Then again I have to remember where I'm posting.

[Kallera]

Because outside of solo (Which isn't that difficult in the first place) giving archer a weak melee attack is a joke?

There seems to be different arguments in this thread. But with regards to this one, there's also the NPC mobs to consider, many of them have to take on whole parties, and to be shut down by just rushing them into melee would render them trash mobs even at higher levels. They would have to come up with a new style of fighting to make it somewhat decent, and that development can be better used for the thief class.

[Capita]

Pugilist is a melee class and they can throw chakrams, what's your point? Maybe they should just remove chakrams and tomahawks from melee classes right? And i'm not mad bro mr. hurr durr memes, I'm just shocked that people can be this adamant over something so ridiculous. Then again I have to remember where I'm posting.

Read my post again, child. Or go back to playing LoL. Either one works.