Let's talk about the shepherd class plz
Let's talk about the shepherd class plz
Need? It's funny you word it this way, particularly when what you're doing is effectively the same. Besides, If you didn't care for my post, why did you respond to it? By what you've said, you should have just ignored it and moved on, friend!
I don't mind seeing the evidence for Musketeer brought up on occasion, especially after large numbers of players join the game, who can't be expected to have known about these things. True, for Musketeer, all the signs are there -- in this case, quite literally.
But this:
Originally Posted by Deifact
Let's talk about the shepherd class plzThis is like a thief's dagger in my thief's heart. We have had not one iota, not a single wisp of smoke signaling the eventual addition of Shepherd. I had imagined it might be a fourth Disciple of the Land class dedicated to taming animals and monsters in order to harvest materials from them in large quantities and/or to improve chances of HQ drops. Who knows what may have been in store? Not us, and I doubt we ever will.Originally Posted by Felis
There was also already a class icon (pic)
Ahh, the common post "why did you respond to it". I respond because I am merely defending the OP. If it was something "I didn't want on the front page" I wouldn't be responding right now. Seeing how I don't care if this thread is on the front page or not, the " Why did you respond to it" makes no sense, seeing how it doesn't bother me ( it also doesn't bother me to respond to your post, I respond to get my point a crossed).
Edit: Anyways, this is a childish discussion so I am going to leave it at that. Have a good day sir.
That is exactly what I am doing ( getting out of the fire). Hypocrite though I'm not believe what ya want though can't stop ya.
Last edited by Starlord; 05-07-2014 at 12:42 AM.
You're a hypocrite, sorry to have to break the bad news to you though. If you can't handle the heat, get out of the fire.Ahh, the common post "why did you respond to it". I respond because I am merely defending the OP. If it was something "I didn't want on the front page" I wouldn't be responding right now. Seeing how I don't care if this thread is on the front page or not, the " Why did you respond to it" makes no sense, seeing how it doesn't bother me ( it also doesn't bother me to respond to your post, I respond to get my point a crossed).
Edit: Anyways, this is a childish discussion so I am going to leave it at that. Have a good day sir.
![]()
So the gist of it is, you took offense to me trying to understand why this person was calling everyone who responded ignorant? Then you tell me that if it bothered me, to not respond, which then makes about the same amount of sense as you responding to me? Well, alright then! Have a good day too, then, sir!Ahh, the common post "why did you respond to it". I respond because I am merely defending the OP. If it was something "I didn't want on the front page" I wouldn't be responding right now. Seeing how I don't care if this thread is on the front page or not, the " Why did you respond to it" makes no sense, seeing how it doesn't bother me ( it also doesn't bother me to respond to your post, I respond to get my point a crossed).
Edit: Anyways, this is a childish discussion so I am going to leave it at that. Have a good day sir.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.