Please Respond Regarding Atma (SE)

[ispano]

People are still missing the point... if it's working as intended, it would be respectful to at least come out and say so rather than neglect a reply.

And it's respectful of you to be begging them to answer something that's not really important, especially when they've said not to address SE with threads?

[Gesser]

And it's respectful of you to be begging them to answer something that's not really important, especially when they've said not to address SE with threads?

Asking and begging are two very different things. But thanks for the insult-sleight.

[ispano]

Asking and begging are two very different things. But thanks for the insult-sleight.

You asked with the first post, then proceeded to beg by pushing the subject.

[C-croft]

And it's respectful of you to be begging them to answer something that's not reallyimportant, especially when they've said not to address SE with threads?

You would have a point if it wasn't for this:
I know some of our players have been looking forward to the continuation of the Zodiac Weapons quests that I mentioned in the recent letter LIVE, but the release of these new quests has been postponed. Our reasoning for this decision is, in brief:
Many players still have yet to obtain an Animus weapon.
We would like to incorporate feedback regarding the difficulty of the Zodiac Weapon quests.
We are working to increase the number of locations where materials for the next upgrade can be obtained.

People are waiting to move on to the next quest, yet are being held back from any progression due to the above. When the premise is that many players will not obtain a weapon by 2.25, and then are told it is being held back for this very reason, does that not raise some red flags? It was important enough to halt and push back a considerable piece of progression, yet that's not really important? What flavor is that Kool-Aid? There is nothing wrong with transparency. When Yoshi-P posts a letter, it is going to be scrutinized.