If no one access a FC house in 35 Days you lose everything! Coming Patch 2.3 ><

[Arkista]

Snip.

Ok let me make this clear I'm not against them wanting to take away a Free company house due to inactivity. Is that clear? I don't know how much clearer I can be on that. What I have an issue with is the short amount of time. is that CLEAR? I understand the reasoning behind SE saying that they will remove a FC house if it goes unused for a certain amount of time. But There are many reason why the 35 day time limit is to short for some Small FCs. I should have to keep coming up with some as well as others. I have given Three options, Two of which wouldn't even hurt SE in anyway . The Third requires SE to add more WARDS. Which I will get to later in this post.

What I do with my Free Company house is my business. I bought it I made the Free Company. Again if SE didn't want small FCs to buy a house then they shouldn't have made the minimum requirement to start one 3 player. No one has any right to tell anyone who can and who cannot buy a House. If I or anyone wants to treat our houses like Personal Housing we can, We bought them.

It's been 6 months where are the Personal Houses?

As for this whole topic as I said over and over it isn't going to effect larger Free Companies and it may only effect the Smaller Free Companies. So tell me what is SE going to do when every single plot on a server is occupied? What will Free Companies who don't own a house but have the funds do? Are they just going to wait and hope that there will be some inactive FC that will lose their house? NO! SE will have to add moreWARDS! If you or anyone thinks that this system SE is going to implement is going to be the problem solver Then you're wrong. I keep saying it SE will get lucky in the first 35 days and manage to get some houses because people wont know. But this isn't going to effect a lot of FCs. But it will effect enough that I feel it should be changed.

As for personal housing, I have no proof that SE will add it to Personal Housing. But why wouldn't they? There are going to be Thousands of single player Housing. [B]What happens when Thousands of players take breaks or quit a year, 2 year, or 5 years down the road? Its ok to have Personal Wards be Empty, Dead, and just a few players running around? You see its a two way street. If SE purpose is to make sure FC Wards aren't empty and dead, Then why would they allow Personal Wards to become Empty and dead?

Snip.

Again over and over have I said it "This is only going to effect a small minority of Small Free Companies".

Imagine a group of 8 IRL friends that wanted to try FFXIV, they got to raiding and experienced the content that they wanted to see. Those 8 people then realise that there won't be any new content for a good 2-3 months, so they find a new game with the intent of going back to FFXIV when new content is up. Do you think it's wise to pay a month or two subscription to just go check a house so it won't disappear?

This is one of the best example of what I'm talking about. There are many Small Free Companies made up of Friends/Family or w/e. People Get burnt out on content, People get tired of lockouts, Or Real life happens. People take breaks. I have said over and over that increasing from 35 to 90 days would be more than enough time. We get major patches every three months, And people come back. Not everyone who plays this game is into the hardcore raiding aspect of the game.