I'd make Ranger a separate class from Archer altogether. There's no reason to fix what isn't broken.



I'd make Ranger a separate class from Archer altogether. There's no reason to fix what isn't broken.



That's foolish. Ranger would play exactly like Bard without songs (which Bard doesn't do 90% of the time anyway).
Archer => Bard
Scout (or something else) => Ranger

I agree, Bards may be support but they have such decent aoe and damage that a Ranger class would just seem superfluous. I'm expecting that the Archer secondary job is likely to be Beastmaster as the bowman with a beast companion is such a staple. Of course, they could buck the trend and give Beastmaster to the axe wielding marauder to shake things up a little. Would be cool. :P
Without having much of a clue about how the job system could change in the future, I personally see the classes playing out a bit like this:
Thief --> Ninja/Blue Mage
Musketeer --> Corsair/Machinist?
Lancer --> Dragoon/Dark Knight
Archer --> Bard/Beastmaster
Gladiator --> Paladin/Red Mage
Marauder --> Warrior/Rune Fencer?
Pugilist --> Monk/Dancer
Conjuror --> White Mage/Geomancer
Thaumaturge --> Black Mage/Time Mage?
Last edited by Ixpheon; 04-12-2014 at 10:07 AM. Reason: punctuation

I keep reading about Ehrmahgerd GEOMANCER. Why is everyone so stuck on it?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




