SE - Reverse these 3 things about Glamours QUICK

[Djeserit]

People want to be able to replace some items that take up two slots, like hooded robes or the stovepipe armor, with the appearance of gear that takes up only one slot, but have appearance slots for both of those slots. Otherwise, the result is that you appear to have no head gear equipped and can't have any appearance in that slot.

I'm sure it's been said, but this is only the introduction of the basic system. They probably wanted to get it done and pushed out to satisfy those who wanted it asap, so likely just coded it the simplest possible. 2.25 or 2.3 would give them time to go back in and adjust for situations like this and make it more fully featured.

[Gesser]

@Zenithance... not it doesn't... sorry.

[Felis]

People want to be able to replace some items that take up two slots, like hooded robes or the stovepipe armor, with the appearance of gear that takes up only one slot, but have appearance slots for both of those slots. Otherwise, the result is that you appear to have no head gear equipped and can't have any appearance in that slot.

And how should it work. There is no gear in the headgear slot you can use as a base and you can't put a headgear image on a body gear

[Naiser]

How do you reverse something that was never in a state OP wanted. And I'm OK with the announced implementation and naming. I speak for myself, but I doubt the majority feels as OP does.

I'd like SE to focus on rolling out epic dungeons and not be distracted by these irksome requests to do more re-work.

[Destinova]

http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodest...043.1384890391

1) Multi-slot->One-slot doesn't let you Glamour the next slot (e.g. head & chest darklight cowl to healer's robe).




Please & Thank You SE!

* In this case, you will not appear to be wearing headwear.

[Duelle]

My emphasis lies more in the female-connotation of being "glamorous" in a Western Society...

Which has no ground to stand on if you actually choose to read quest and leve text. Glamour is tossed all over the place when referring to illusion magic, so glamour makes sense. Just because it isn't part of your everyday vocabulary does not make a word fit or unfit for use in a fictional setting.

I do agree that there should be a rule for multi-slot armor. Granted the fact they used multi-slot armor in the first place invites all sorts of problems, but they already made their bed on that one.

[Gesser]

My augment has nothing to do with the term fitting or not. Glamour fits I just don't like it as much as Mirage Prism. Nor so because of its English language connotation. But again, that's just my opinion. You & others are welcome to their own, I'm not fighting the suitability of the term.

[Xayoc]

On #2:

[Wilksha]

I love how you say glamour is more girly mirage prism. Add power to the end of mirage prism, and you pretty much have sailor moon's transformation call. So are you saying magical girls are less girly then glamours? Does anyone even use glamour to say someone looks fabulous? In all my 29 year, I have never once heard glamour used as a fashion related word.
On a game note, the use of glamour is in the game when you do some combat leve. The ones with the monsters that change after you use an item on them or attack them. Glamour fits better into the game then mirage prism does.

[Penguinmayhem]

And how should it work. There is no gear in the headgear slot you can use as a base and you can't put a headgear image on a body gear

So everyone who is forced to wear gear that takes two slots will just have to deal with the fact that they can never glamour themselves a helmet image or boots, I suppose? Sorry every tank in the game, you're stuck with your crappy stovepipe armor or nothing.