Results 1 to 10 of 240

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player ReiszRie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    386
    Character
    Reisz Rie
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by C-croft View Post
    I don't biatch about losing the 20%. It's called the end of a promotion. This happens all the time. And frankly, I simply don't have the time and energy to write letters or batch at someone because I didn't get a 20% discount even though a promotion, regardless if it's one time or a year long, is over. Stop twisting it as though you don't feel entitled based off your own expectations.
    End of a promotion? that is the best argument you could come up with? oh god.

    I love how those against a better veteran reward have absolutely not a single compelling argument.

    In fact, it is really strange to see people choosing to have sub-par items (and vehemently defend it) over the possibility of attaining a better one.
    (0)
    Last edited by ReiszRie; 03-20-2014 at 03:46 AM.

  2. #2
    Player
    C-croft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    907
    Character
    Cloudcroft Ieyasu
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 52
    Quote Originally Posted by ReiszRie View Post
    End of a promotion? that is the best argument you could come up with? oh god.

    I love how those against a better veteran reward have absolutely not a single compelling argument.

    In fact, it is really strange to see people choosing to have sub-par items (and vehemently defend it) over the possibility of attaining a better one.
    There is no compelling argument to make. You are crying over something that doesn't even have to be given. It's called looking a gift horse in the mouth. We don't have the right to choose. You and some others are turning this into Occupy Eorzea. It's entitlement and the fact that you choose to deny this and state that there is even a compelling argument to make is ridiculous.
    (2)
    You should have bought an authenticator.....



    Your tears feed me....

  3. #3
    Player ReiszRie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    386
    Character
    Reisz Rie
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by C-croft View Post
    There is no compelling argument to make. You are crying over something that doesn't even have to be given. It's called looking a gift horse in the mouth. We don't have the right to choose. You and some others are turning this into Occupy Eorzea. It's entitlement and the fact that you choose to deny this and state that there is even a compelling argument to make is ridiculous.
    It still isn't a compelling argument, your argument is one of rhetorics and it would have been valid if Rank 7 veteran rewards are the first veteran rewards, the fact that there are preceding veteran rewards sets an expectation of the value a customer is to receive from veteran rewards and the fact that Rank 8 veteran rewards goes back to the trend set by the previous 6 further solidifies our position.

    I'd be pissed if the rewards program of a casino i frequent, gives me 50 free hamburgers for a year of spending X amount of money when all previous months, i've been getting stays in a hotel suite. same scenario, when you've set precedence in terms of rewards, you'd naturally set an expectation from your customers.

    You might feel indifferent towards the veteran rewards but there are those who values it for what it gives, you might not agree with our protests and you have the rights to either ignore or participate in the discussion but if you wish to disagree, the onus is on you to provide a compelling argument on why we should suck it up and not have expectations from a rewards program created by the devs and with expectations of the reward value set by the devs or perhaps simply to provide a compelling argument as to why 50 free teleport is appropriate for a Rank 7 reward when you get a Behemoth mount and GC leader minion for Rank 6

    The fact remains that veteran rewards are a marketing strategy implemented to improve sales and pad SE's bottomline, it serves as an incentive to entice players in subscribing to larger chunks of game time, it really isn't an innocent carebear thank you gesture as what you've been trying to portray it as. Digital in game items bears minimum cost for SE to implement and our feedback on what players who subscribes 180 days at a time wants and expects from the veteran rewards are invaluable in strengthening their marketing strategy.

    We are not mindlessly ranting here, we have put out our arguments, its in your ball-court now.
    (2)
    Last edited by ReiszRie; 03-20-2014 at 12:19 PM.

  4. #4
    Player
    C-croft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    907
    Character
    Cloudcroft Ieyasu
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 52
    Quote Originally Posted by ReiszRie View Post
    It still isn't a compelling argument, your argument is one of rhetorics and it would have been valid if Rank 7 veteran rewards are the first veteran rewards, the fact that there are preceding veteran rewards sets an expectation of the value a customer is toreceive from veteran rewards and the fact that Rank 8 veteran rewards goes back to the trend set by the previous 6 further solidifies our position.

    I'd be pissed if the rewards program of a casino i frequent, gives me 50 free hamburgers for a year of spending X amount of money when all previous months, i've been getting stays in a hotel suite. same scenario, when you've set precedence in terms of rewards, you'd naturally set an expectation from your customers.

    You might feel indifferent towards the veteran rewards but there are those who values it for what it gives, you might not agree with our protests and you have the rights to either ignore or participate in the discussion but if you wish to disagree, the onus is on you to provide a compelling argument on why we should suck it up and not have expectations from a rewards program created by the devs and with expectations of the reward value set by the devs or perhaps simply to provide a compelling argument as to why 50 free teleport is appropriate for a Rank 7 reward when you get a Behemoth mount and GC leader minion for Rank 6

    The fact remains that veteran rewards are a marketing strategy implemented to improve sales and pad SE's bottomline, it serves as an incentive to entice players in subscribing to larger chunks of game time, it really isn't an innocent carebear thank you gesture as what you've been trying to portray it as.

    We are not mindlessly ranting here, we have put out our arguments, its in your ball-court now.
    These vet rewards do not have to fulfill your expectations. I will be honest, it is a slightly odd choice of vet rewards, but it is still something given to you free of charge. It doesn't matter if you feel entitled to something grander than the previous awards, it's a free gift for subbing. You can not sub and get nothing at all as well.

    EDIT

    Quoted you as you were editing.

    The enticement to sub for longer chunks is to fulfill your need to have something sooner. The bonus for subbing for longer chunks is the fact that you have access to multiple characters per world. I believe you also see a discounted rate for the subscription bundle. The veteran reward is for longevity. As a consumer, it is your responsibility to manage your funds as you see fit. If you are unable to pay monthly and see these rewards over the course of your subscription, that is a mismanagement on your side. You should be paying for access, not vet rewards.

    Clarification, not telling you to spend your money, just that your money pays for access not rewards. Also your chunk sub does entitle the rewards immediately simply because you have already paid forward for the access, meaning whether or not you choose to play, your longevity takes you beyond the 360 days.
    (0)
    Last edited by C-croft; 03-20-2014 at 12:38 PM.
    You should have bought an authenticator.....



    Your tears feed me....

  5. #5
    Player ReiszRie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    386
    Character
    Reisz Rie
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by C-croft View Post
    These vet rewards do not have to fulfill your expectations. I will be honest, it is a slightly odd choice of vet rewards, but it is still something given to you free of charge. It doesn't matter if you feel entitled to something grander than the previous awards, it's a free gift for subbing. You can not sub and get nothing at all as well.

    EDIT

    Quoted you as you were editing.

    The enticement to sub for longer chunks is to fulfill your need to have something sooner. The bonus for subbing for longer chunks is the fact that you have access to multiple characters per world. I believe you also see a discounted rate for the subscription bundle. The veteran reward is for longevity. As a consumer, it is your responsibility to manage your funds as you see fit. If you are unable to pay monthly and see these rewards over the course of your subscription, that is a mismanagement on your side. You should be paying for access, not vet rewards.

    Clarification, not telling you to spend your money, just that your money pays for access not rewards. Also your chunk sub does entitle the rewards immediately simply because you have already paid forward for the access, meaning whether or not you choose to play, your longevity takes you beyond the 360 days.
    I can't agree more with a previous comment stating that "nothing is truly free"

    Indeed, you might view veteran rewards as "free" but reality is that it pays for itself through an increased block subscription time, that is how marketing works, if you buy a car and they give you an ipad, is it truly free or is it to sweeten the deal? if our feedback reaches the devs and they decides to make it a permanent free teleport, does it bring dis-benefit to you? this is what confuses me, how players are actively making the choice to not receive a better reward is somewhat like buying products at full MSRP and refusing to ask or accept a deal.

    we pay for the game, that is undeniable but if a company implements a rewards (marketing) program, it isn't unreasonable for customers to have expectations from it even though the very same customers would most likely still purchase without the rewards, it is what you'd call customer satisfaction.

    perhaps it is prudent for the players here to not view the veteran rewards as an innocent "thank you" but rather that SE is a for-profit organization and FFXIV is a revenue generating business and the veteran rewards are a marketing program to increase revenue.
    (0)

  6. #6
    Player
    C-croft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    907
    Character
    Cloudcroft Ieyasu
    World
    Goblin
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 52
    Quote Originally Posted by ReiszRie View Post
    I can't agree more with a previous comment stating that "nothing is truly free"

    Indeed, you might view veteran rewards as "free" but reality is that it pays for itself through an increased block subscription time, that is how marketing works, if you buy a car and they give you an ipad, is it truly free or is it to sweeten the deal? if our feedback reaches the devs and they decides to make it a permanent free teleport, does it bring dis-benefit to you? this is what confuses me, how players are actively making the choice to not receive a better reward is somewhat like buying products at full MSRP and refusing to ask or accept a deal.

    we pay for the game, that is undeniable but if a company implements a rewards (marketing) program, it isn't unreasonable for customers to have expectations from it even though the very same customers would most likely still purchase without the rewards, it is what you'd call customer satisfaction.

    perhaps it is prudent for the players here to not view the veteran rewards as an innocent "thank you" but rather that SE is a for-profit organization and FFXIV is a revenue generating business and the veteran rewards are a marketing program to increase revenue.
    You are paying for a sub for access, not the vet rewards. The deal you are referring to is a free addon such as rims to the car or some other package(vet rewards), and paying full MSRP would be equivalent to paying the full price on the sub. Keeping in mind that 6 months of sub time is getting a discount on full MSRP since you get the standard sub discounted to the rate of a basic sub. You are complaining that the tickets aren't good enough to you. Sure it's about customer satisfaction, but satisfaction only goes so far for freebie items. Your satisfaction should be coming from content within the game, not the veteran rewards you are given.
    (0)
    You should have bought an authenticator.....



    Your tears feed me....

  7. #7
    Player
    SLeonhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    12
    Character
    Denathor Exel
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 30
    Quote Originally Posted by C-croft View Post
    You are paying for a sub for access, not the vet rewards. The deal you are referring to is a free addon such as rims to the car or some other package(vet rewards), and paying full MSRP would be equivalent to paying the full price on the sub.
    Right, ok, let's run with your car analogy.

    You've just bought a new car and you're told you've come at a good time because there's a special offer on and you're going to get some "free", "special" alloy wheels as an extra at no additional cost. They bring the wheels out - They suck. They're awful and you'd rather have the original trims.

    As a customer purchasing a car - Are you genuinely saying you wouldn't ask for an alternative set of alloy wheels - if the ones on offer were (in your opinion), terrible? Or would it just be terribly rude to refuse the awful alloys, because they're "free"?

    It seems to me that we have a split between the savvy consumers amongst us and the "let's just get what we're given" lot.
    (1)
    Last edited by SLeonhart; 03-21-2014 at 03:16 AM.