Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 77
  1. #51
    Player
    SeleneSinclair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    54
    Character
    Sakura Kinomoto
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate View Post
    Greetings,

    The development team is looking into placing limitations on the use of the ready check feature, as this should not be used during battle. In addition, for patch 2.2 they are also discussing making it so the person who initiated the ready check will have their name displayed.
    Thank you very much!
    (0)

  2. #52
    Player
    Pence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,455
    Character
    Bravo Whiskey
    World
    Ravana
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by ajx View Post
    Half the posts are talking about
    Showing the name of the initiator (patch 2.2)
    Making it unusable in combat ( upcoming - no ETA given)

    Whereas the post was only about making a cooldown of some sort out of combat .

    Jus sayin in case no one has noticed
    What are you even chirpin' aboot?

    "We've confirmed that the team is looking into limiting the use of ready check to outside of battle around patch 2.3."

    This? I'm confused. You're confusing me. Stop it.
    (0)

  3. #53
    Player
    Mordermi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    185
    Character
    Mordermi Auditore
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Camate View Post
    Greetings,

    The development team is looking into placing limitations on the use of the ready check feature, as this should not be used during battle. In addition, for patch 2.2 they are also discussing making it so the person who initiated the ready check will have their name displayed.
    Quote Originally Posted by SeleneSinclair View Post
    Thank you very much!
    There it is. I was hoping someone would post Camate's response. Did everyone miss that? Camate looks to be saying something different than Hvinire. What Hvinire said is related to "limiting the use of ready check outside of battle.." To me, it sounds like they are looking into preventing you from spamming it while outside of battle for 2.3. They could still do other things, such as not allow a ready check while in battle, or display the name of the person initiating it as Camate said.

    Also, for those of you who think it's just a couple of lines of code... That may be true, but those couple lines of code get put into thousands of lines of code, and it'd be foolish to just throw it in there. Programming is not as simple as "Throw this line in here. Okay. We're good now. Testing? Nah. Real programmers do it in production."
    (1)
    Last edited by Mordermi; 02-25-2014 at 10:35 PM.

  4. #54
    Player Versiroth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    608
    Character
    Kraiden Draxenian
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 50
    I made the window super small and moved it into a corner of the screen that isn't all that important for battle. So, at least there is that work around.
    (1)

  5. #55
    Player
    Masekase_Hurricane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,912
    Character
    Masekase Hurricane
    World
    Louisoix
    Main Class
    Astrologian Lv 100
    Should be in the hot fixes.
    (0)

  6. #56
    Player
    Sadana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,533
    Character
    Valia Rosa
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 71
    How about just take it away until the limits are put in place. In my opinion, the Ready Check is unnecessary; we ask and say <Ready!> just fine without it.
    (1)

  7. #57
    Player
    Defmetal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delete Lalafell
    Posts
    397
    Character
    Eadieni Valefor
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 100
    Let's just assume they meant 2.2 not 2.3?
    I doubt it will take them 4 months to fix a simple issue like this...
    (0)

  8. #58
    Player
    Pence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,455
    Character
    Bravo Whiskey
    World
    Ravana
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Defmetal View Post
    Let's just assume they meant 2.2 not 2.3?
    I doubt it will take them 4 months to fix a simple issue like this...
    Keep in mind....XI has -Just- got acc/stat display....after requesting it for a decade.

    Nek minit.....QOL from relaunch are still lingering. It's a 'simple', obvious issue which should never have been an issue...had they posted it on forums, or a test server before going live...i assure you it would have been picked up in a few minutes.

    Tl;dr: SE MMORPG.
    (0)

  9. #59
    Player
    Alistaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    2,980
    Character
    Your Character
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Blue Mage Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Mordermi View Post
    There it is. I was hoping someone would post Camate's response. Did everyone miss that? Camate looks to be saying something different than Hvinire. What Hvinire said is related to "limiting the use of ready check outside of battle.." To me, it sounds like they are looking into preventing you from spamming it while outside of battle for 2.3. They could still do other things, such as not allow a ready check while in battle, or display the name of the person initiating it as Camate said."
    Posting the name of who initiated the check will limit its use out of battle because if one person is spamming it that's harassment and you'd be free to vote-kick them.
    (0)

  10. #60
    Player
    CHunterX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    96
    Character
    Rin Tezuka
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistaire View Post
    Posting the name of who initiated the check will limit its use out of battle because if one person is spamming it that's harassment and you'd be free to vote-kick them.
    And if its another alliance full of Free Company players in CT?
    (0)

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast