Quote Originally Posted by T0rin View Post
Same bad arguments we've heard 20 times over.
Oh the internet. Where we are expected to respect random person X's data like it's just been published in Nature and is about to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry without actually being able to question the results on the basis of the experiment or demand verification/replication of the results by a 3rd party. And if someone questions the self-proclaimed expert without their own equally spurious data they are automatically labeled a troll. Nothing I brought up is unreasonable argument if you actually understand how to interpret data, experiments, or have a fundamental grasp on logical inference. You yourself acknowledge a .05% variance in the 4 gear sets' results which any reasonable person would accept as not being statistically significant enough to form the basis of the argument that determination is better than crit.

Anyways, I'm done responding to this thread since I'm a 'troll'. Official forums have lived up to their reputation of being devoid of intelligent discourse. Back to BG forums.