Yoshi -P and Dev Team are doing a Great Job, WAR will Not Outshine PLD. PLD is Fine

[Maqaqa]

The actual question is; why would they? They certainly don't *need* it. Only Warrior needs that kind of thing based on their skills.

Nevermind... this is becoming the forum of people that doesnt play a tank but still wants to argue about tanks <.<

[Exstal]

Nevermind... this is becoming the forum of people that doesnt play a tank but still wants to argue about tanks <.<

You act like how to play tank isn't an issue that has been beaten to death. You could theorectically not even unlock THM (which from your profile you haven't) and easily go teach another THM how to play it. Why? You can just ask someone who is good at the class how to play and just relay the information. See where I'm going with this? Also if you can do it (tank) without DPS accessories, why would you go out of your way to do it with?

Seriously though, what is more reasonable;
a) chance/farmed i90 VIT acc
b) very expensive i70 crafted DPS acc

[Maqaqa]

You act like how to play tank isn't an issue that has been beaten to death. You could theorectically not even unlock THM (which from your profile you haven't) and easily go teach another THM how to play it. Why? You can just ask someone who is good at the class how to play and just relay the information. See where I'm going with this? Also if you can do it (tank) without DPS accessories, why would you go out of your way to do it with?

Seriously though, what is more reasonable;
a) chance/farmed i90 VIT acc
b) very expensive i70 crafted DPS acc

You didnt really read the thread, did you?
We were discussing about PLDs being on par with WARs damage in a DD "stance".
To which i replied that this is often only true in theory, since not many PLDs are using "damage dealing" gear (this means either a griph set or just a secondary set of jewels with attack stats, you dont need to be millionaire to get a DD set: "striking" gear works perfectly).
Then you come and tell me there is no reason for a PLD to wear such gear... kinda proving my point, nope?

Btw you dont see me on the THM forum you know why? I dont play one.

[Exstal]

You didnt really read the thread, did you?
We were discussing about PLDs being on par with WARs damage in a DD "stance".
To which i replied that this is often only true in theory, since not many PLDs are using "damage dealing" gear (this means either a griph set or just a secondary set of jewels with attack stats, you dont need to be millionaire to get a DD set: "striking" gear works perfectly).
Then you come and tell me there is no reason for a PLD to wear such gear... kinda proving my point, nope?

The theory assumes both tanks have same gear. Once you decide that you're going to give Warrior DPS acc and Paladin tank acc, of course DPS won't be the same (or even close). Why did you have to even bring that up?

Btw you dont see me on the THM forum you know why? I dont play one.

You completely missed the point I was making.

[Maqaqa]

The theory assumes both tanks have same gear.

So again, you are agreeing with me.

[Exstal]

So again, you are agreeing with me.

I'm explaining what theory dictates. You can't say, "tanks have the same auto attack damage (with same gear)". Then in the field give Warrior +1 relic with full DPS acc and give Paladin Ifrit sword with soulbinding accessories.

@Exstal: Ignore Maqaqa, he/she/it is just ignorant, don't waste your time.

It's the principle of making sure that other prospective tanks don't get suckered into his skewed view of the tank issue.

[Phreak]

It's the principle of making sure that other prospective tanks don't get suckered into his skewed view of the tank issue.

Sad thing is people thumbs up the crap he spews.