Results 1 to 10 of 15

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    ispano's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    2,753
    Character
    Melfina Amastacia
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 60
    Yeah, you will still be able to Flare > Convert/Pot/Ballad > Flare, without issue. The bug is as Stark said.
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    OrionInerghem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    252
    Character
    Aldebaron Phoenix
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by ispano View Post
    Yeah, you will still be able to Flare > Convert/Pot/Ballad > Flare, without issue. The bug is as Stark said.
    Black Mage:
    While we focused on buffing the melee DPS classes/jobs for this patch, we do not have any plans to buff the black mage job. On a side note, there was a bug that caused players to be able to use flare twice in a row, but that will be addressed.


    Hmm Well I would like some confirmation here, as the 1 tick of ice really doesn't seem that OP to me either
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player
    TirionCrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    705
    Character
    Tirion Crey
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 86
    Quote Originally Posted by OrionInerghem View Post
    Black Mage:
    While we focused on buffing the melee DPS classes/jobs for this patch, we do not have any plans to buff the black mage job. On a side note, there was a bug that caused players to be able to use flare twice in a row, but that will be addressed.


    Hmm Well I would like some confirmation here, as the 1 tick of ice really doesn't seem that OP to me either
    Why thehell do you ask for confirmation, when all you did was make assumptions based on nothing but "Yoshi said there is a bug with BLM using 2 Flares"...

    People told you what the bug was...and it clearly is the more obvious "real bug" than just using Convert and Flare again...so you better get confirmation for your assumption before spreading BS.
    (0)