If this is True, SE is TOO EVIL!

[viion]

I still dont get it.....

D2010.09.18.0000.patch 5,442 KB < thats 5.4mb not 300
D2010.09.19.0000.patch 433,984 KB < thats 433mb not 300
D2010.11.25.0002.patch 244,843 KB < thats 244mb not 300
D2010.12.13.0000.patch 257,141 KB < thats 257mb not 300
D2011.05.19.0000.patch 336,172 KB < thats 336mb not 300

So where are we download the same 300 mb update?

They also all contain adjustments/changes which you dont see (and you have to redownload the whole file. SE are not smart enough to make the patcher decrypt/edit/encrypt) So if a 17mb file needs 2-3 lines changing, you're redownloading that whole 17mb!

If you use win7 just go to SE root and hit Search:Today and it shows you files modified today, and I guarantee you they total near the patch size or above.

[Starlord]

I still dont get it.....

D2010.09.18.0000.patch 5,442 KB < thats 5.4mb not 300
D2010.09.19.0000.patch 433,984 KB < thats 433mb not 300
D2010.11.25.0002.patch 244,843 KB < thats 244mb not 300
D2010.12.13.0000.patch 257,141 KB < thats 257mb not 300
D2011.05.19.0000.patch 336,172 KB < thats 336mb not 300

So where are we download the same 300 mb update?

They also all contain adjustments/changes which you dont see (and you have to redownload the whole file. SE are not smart enough to make the patcher decrypt/edit/encrypt) So if a 17mb file needs 2-3 lines changing, you're redownloading that whole 17mb!

If you use win7 just go to SE root and hit Search:Today and it shows you files modified today, and I guarantee you they total near the patch size or above.

And not to Mention There is no " Gradual Increase" per patch it goes up, down, up, up If they were all up I can see your point to a degree, but they are not.

So the Adding to each patch thing is an invalid argument