Results 1 to 10 of 832

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Aegis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1,161
    Character
    Aegis Elisus
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Armorer Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Vandark View Post
    --I have told you already that I was talking about my thread having most people agreeing with me in relation to my beta topic not the entire community as a whole, as the entire community as a whole had not even seen or read my thread thats not possible.

    Perhaps you should instead of bashing me constantly think up a solution to this problem yourself?
    Can it not be reliably interpreted then, that if 99% of the game playing and beta testing population didn't feel this was enough of an problem to be bothered to log onto the forums and make their own thread or contribute to an existing thread that it really isn't a problem?

    As such, no solution need be sought.

    Can you tell me which of your solutions will make everyone happy? Can you tell me if they introduced a different size it wouldn't annoy more people? Can you tell me for absolutely certain that adding several options it would have absolutely no impact on performance on PS3 or low spec PCs? (If so, can you tell me how you came up with that information?)

    So far, a tiny fragment of a percentage of the population have supported your statement. It's going to need a lot more than that to convince me this is anything other than a waste of dev time and resources.
    (2)

  2. #2
    Player Vandark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    382
    Character
    Van Dark
    World
    Masamune
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Aegis View Post
    Snip
    I don't see why haveing both choices couldn't be enough to please the majority, everyone who misses the old shape could at least select it while others who have now come to like the new shape can stick with that, this could be a good solution.

    It's not a waste of the devs time if it makes for more happy customers and they already have the resources, all they need to do is scale the lower region a little it won't even effect the gear, look at all that space!

    So much of the gear would still fit the orrigonal 1.0 size they may need to make slight adjustments on newly introduced gear but it would be as simple as a slight scale up for those who chose the orrigonal body shape.

    It's much easier than adding a slider which would require ALOT of work.

    Quote Originally Posted by Velo_Vandore View Post
    I am curious to know, for those who oppose the OP's request - do you personally prefer the 1.0 butt, the 2.0 butt or don't mind at all?
    I too would like to know the answer to this, are the people who disagree with wanting the 1.0 back against it because they like the 2.0 butl?
    Also why would anyone be against the idea of both being optional?
    (0)
    Last edited by Vandark; 09-03-2013 at 12:39 AM.