I can’t ignore this anymore! Something should be done about it!

[Rinpoo]

I don't think we have to insult each other here, that's rather uncalled for.

It doesn't even have anything to do with any form of perversion, it simply looks...odd, not right. Not agreeing is fine, but nobody has to call anyone a pervert over it. People...

[Vandark]

I don't think we have to insult each other here, that's rather uncalled for.

It doesn't even have anything to do with any form of perversion, it simply looks...odd, not right. Not agreeing is fine, but nobody has to call anyone a pervert over it. People...

Thanks Rinpoo it's a shame it happened to be this area of our characters with the problem because it's hard to talk about this issue without others being judgmental about it.

If your honest with yourself tho it's actually a really huge flaw in the 2.0 character models because they look very misshapen and unpreaportional, it’s very abnormal looking.

I don’t think it should be a major priority or anything but it shouldn’t be disregarded either, it should be treated as a legitimate issue and it should be patched at some point in the future.

I would be happy and patient knowing they at least had plans to fix it.

[moizeus]

Also the movement got wowdiced/eqdice. I remember in 1.0 you could move back without moving your camera. When you ran, and stop suddenly the character would make such physics. Blame the WoWdification, and PS3.

[Rinpoo]

Also the movement got wowdiced/eqdice. I remember in 1.0 you could move back without moving your camera. When you ran, and stop suddenly the character would make such physics. Blame the WoWdification, and PS3.

Ahh right, now that used to look so lovely. One of the things I really miss to be honest. Yea yea, nothing important, only fluff, but it gave the game a nice and more realistic touch. Now I understand they had to take out a few things in exchange for the wide variety we have in landscape now, but still I'll be missing it.

[Vanidin]

I'd never noticed the difference in models to be honest... I guess I was too busy adventuring to zoom in and study the proportions and angles of my character's model.

[Leafcore]

Both models look fantastic to me. Better than a muffin top.

Not sure why some of you guys are complaining...

[Tiraelina]

If you truly cared so much about appearances you would've noticed they didn't change the models at all.

No, your screenshots are not valid comparisons either when they're not even the same angles or animations.

[Vandark]

If you truly cared so much about appearances you would've noticed they didn't change the models at all.

No, your screenshots are not valid comparisons either when they're not even the same angles or animations.

Really?



Compare the size of the heads, Compare the small part above the tail and what surrounds it.

How about another 2.0 side on picture. How can you possibly be ok with the 2.0 body.



The original was small enough as it was but it looked normal still, it didn't need to be non-existent.
There needs to be something there instead of nothing at all, it doesn't look normal otherwise.

[Sterob]

Really?



Compare the size of the heads, Compare the small part above the tail and what surrounds it.

How about another 2.0 side on picture. How can you possibly be ok with the 2.0 body.

the 2.0 character's back look crooked. I agree that this should be address. And i believe that the department handling model and texture does not have anything to do with server and data centre capabilities

[Kevonovitch]

as a boob man, ass is almost over-rated, but i can appreciate the fact that yeah....dafuq? there IS one supposed to be there, not missing entirely..