Hydaelyn.
Also, it's hardly proof against SCH. The artwork for the cover may predate the decision to include a Scholar. I don't suppose GLA is the only playable class in 1.0 because of the cover now, do I?
Hydaelyn.
Also, it's hardly proof against SCH. The artwork for the cover may predate the decision to include a Scholar. I don't suppose GLA is the only playable class in 1.0 because of the cover now, do I?
We'll take it into consideration.™




That would have been an odd choice considering all the classes in the logo, but now that you mention it, anybody else remember when that logo confirmed samurai in 2010?
Bah, anyway, as of the self-deletion of my way-too-long ramble about logical hierarchies in the SCH thread... I'm retired from speculation about game mechanics. I live to lore.
"I shall refrain from making any further wild claims until such time as I have evidence."
– Y'shtola
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



