You obviously did not get the reference! ^o^
Coming up on Maury:
It's okay!
It's from Jurassic Park. All the Dinosaurs were female so they couldn't breed but "found a way" to breed anyway. XD
Well no wonder, if it's 2 female's a way can be found... 2 male's not so much... There are some creatures that can do that change now a day, but typically it's from F to M if needed, M to F i have not heard of.
....I don't want to think about this any more. o.o Is that okay?
Sure! Let's switch to a relevant visual comparison (that has nothing to do with dragon babies):
Deathwing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq4Y7ztznKc
Bahamut: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h542YbZuwkQ
I don't know about anyone else, but Bahamut had me much more terrified than Deathwing.
Kindred - www.kindredlinkshell.com • My XIVPad - http://www.xivpads.com/?profile/1592...onsong/balmung
I think its the speech and the actions. Deathwing, in what I guess would be his first appearance, seemed to promise destruction. Said destruction in the video seemed more passive, where stuff would break from his mere approach.Sure! Let's switch to a relevant visual comparison (that has nothing to do with dragon babies):
Deathwing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq4Y7ztznKc
Bahamut: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h542YbZuwkQ
I don't know about anyone else, but Bahamut had me much more terrified than Deathwing.
Bahamut, had no speech, now he might have speech later, but this was pure unchained ferocity, a dragon at its height of fury. With an almost Orbital Frame approach to destruction, every target, every direction, everywhere.
So to compare:Sure! Let's switch to a relevant visual comparison (that has nothing to do with dragon babies):
Deathwing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq4Y7ztznKc
Bahamut: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h542YbZuwkQ
I don't know about anyone else, but Bahamut had me much more terrified than Deathwing.
Bahamut in 3:48 of the video you can see his wing span is bigger then LL. The Key that fell from Dalmund is bigger in size then Deathwing alone. When Bahamut descends before they try to reseal him, he is bigger then L.Pandora in FF8, and that structure was massive. Deathwing is many times smaller. Same video 6:12 you can see in the background LL or part of LL is clearly destroyed and in ruin... so he does not miss when he fly's by LL in the cinematic.
just deathwing, eh? seems like selective bias.
keep this in mind. we'll come back to it.
this is exaggeration. first of all, we have to understand and accept that bahamut is being used as a convenient excuse for redesigning the game world, and he serves that function admirably. the dev team have even specifically commented that he mostly only messed up mor dhona and coerthas (though not *only* those areas- they just saw the worst of it). other places were completely untouched. all of thanalan, for example. other areas which were changed without being attacked were explained by the gravity from Dalamud's descent reshaping the land. while you could attribute this to bahamut, i don't think that's very fair considering it's entirely incidental.On the other hand, Bahamut manages to change the face of pretty much all of Eorzea within minutes of emerging, changing entire climates in some cases from what we've seen. And I don't mean "making a long trench here, or a large crater there", I mean rendering the world pretty much unrecognizable to anyone who saw it during 1.0. Outside of the cities (which seemed to have been mostly spared, just like in WoW).
and let's go back to your 2.5 years comment about deathwing, which is accurate enough. but look at the state of ARR- it appears just 5 years after the events ending 1.0. you're telling me he succeeded in destroying the world, and we rebuilt it all in just 5 years? i'm not buying it.
pretty sure devs commented on this, too- only players participating in the battles ending 1.0 were teleported away into the future. other people who were far away from the attacks, in lands which were untouched, were subsequently untouched themselves. not only is this evident through the simple fact that the chocobos all seem alive and well, but in ARR there will be a distinction between legacy and non-legacy players, where the legacy players will have slightly different dialogue and story than non-legacy, referencing the events ending 1.0. non-legacy players will get something a little different, and a little different flavor text from NPCs.And then there's the matter of the folks in XIV having to be actually teleported away to safety, or face certain annihilation. We don't know if that was everyone on Eorzea, or just those immediately within and around the cities. That remains to be seen... and perhaps something in ARR will explain all that.
i think it's easy enough to assume that new non-legacy adventurers aren't 5 years old, so for them to exist at an adult age 5 years after Dalamud's descent, but be completely unaffected and uninvolved with that story arc- this seems to only underscore the implication that they were simply in different parts of the world at the time of those events, and were thus unaffected. unless they just appear out of the aether as fully functional adult beings? but that would ruin immersion, wouldn't it?
and here we disagree on one point, in spite of agreeing on another. bahamut does seem to be the more powerful of the two, and many have covered perfectly valid points underlining why- but as has been pointed out several times now, bahamut also failed to destroy the world, and didn't even really destroy that much (again, unless you also credit Dalamud's descent with changing the landscape, but wouldn't that credit better belong to Darnus?). yes, some areas of azeroth were unaffected, but most of those were expansion areas far removed from deathwing's immediate reach. the entire vanilla azeroth was changed.
now, that said, it definitely took him a lot longer to accomplish that in relation to what bahamut did in a few seconds- so again, the scales seem to obviously tip in bahamut's favor here. so why go to so much trouble to disagree with certain points when i agree with the end assessment?
because the avenues people take in arriving to that assessment are often biased and inaccurate. and in the end, what's the point of a discussion board if people aren't free to disagree with particulars, whether they agree overall or not? because then it's just a bunch of people talking for the sake of talking, saying whatever they want without considering anything else, and that defeats the purpose of the discussion part of the forum, no?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.