He didn't talk about it. I suggest not to hold your breath about it though. It'd be nice, but I personally doubt they'll reissue the old CE items.
I don't know, there was Onion Knight armour shown in one of the older presentations. I think it was on a Crystal Tower slide. I don't know why they'd advertise it and not include it in the game.
Me personally, I wouldn't be playing a Japanese game if i expected solid (insert non-Japanese language here). Especially since his point partially points to the fact this is indeed a Japanese game which generally is known to have quality VO work. So if it's bad in (language), slap on subtitles and listen to the default track.
However, I think the whole "RP" thing is a bit silly. I know this is an RPG, but MMOs are so far from sticking to the RP elements that you can't really hold it in the same light as how the general playerbase will be perceiving. (The ones SE will actually get the most money from.)
Yeah but I don't think it included the original Onion helm, or did it?
Yea it didI can't get a hold of the pic right now, but the helm was how I recognised it.
EDIT: http://www.finalfantasy.net/xiv/fina...oducer-live-5/ It's on the slide with Gilgamesh. I can't host the image right now but it's on there!
Last edited by Andreas-Lycaeus; 05-04-2013 at 08:43 AM.
Funnily enough it actually seems a different item from what we have been given with the CE:Yea it didI can't get a hold of the pic right now, but the helm was how I recognised it.
EDIT: http://www.finalfantasy.net/xiv/fina...oducer-live-5/ It's on the slide with Gilgamesh. I can't host the image right now but it's on there!
The cloth part under the chin and around the neck is dark instead of light grey.
Also the armor is different from the onion armor we had with 1.0
I would say it's probably a completely different set. Mind you, not that it's really important to me, because I'll be found dead before wearing that helm, even if I have it![]()
except you always say other people are mad. always. without fail. and when people dare suggest it's actually *you* who seems upset, you either say "no u" or make it seem silly they'd say "no u" in spite of how many times you've used the same tactic yourself. it's awfully transparent.
stop acting like an angsty fourteen year old 4chan anon and get a new shtick, chief.
If you weren't mad you wouldn't feel the need to attack people on a personal level as much as you do, and just did, as usual.except you always say other people are mad. always. without fail. and when people dare suggest it's actually *you* who seems upset, you either say "no u" or make it seem silly they'd say "no u" in spite of how many times you've used the same tactic yourself. it's awfully transparent.
stop acting like an angsty fourteen year old 4chan anon and get a new shtick, chief.
Let's just carry on. Nothing new to see here.
Last edited by Abriael; 05-04-2013 at 10:42 AM.
1. get called out for a very specific behavior
2. exhibit precisely the behavior you're called out for, but project it onto others (as predicted)
3. ???
4. profit desu
The difference is that I didn't call you (or anyone else) a "angsty fourteen year old 4chan anon" or any other derogatory definitions, which quite obviously defeats your comparison.
If you can't make a point without attacking your counterpart on a personal level, you may want not to make a point at all, because it only proves my point. So thank you very much.
Last edited by Abriael; 05-05-2013 at 01:01 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.