Conjecture Question..Any evidence to support/reject this theory concerning Echo?

[Lady]

I feel like this picked up steam only because of the Conspiracy Keanu pic regarding the same in thing in that memes topic.

I stay out of that thread due to some of the pictures being NSFW, and I'm usually only in the forums while at work.

Otherwise, as of now this is the same thing as the theory from Assassin's Creed that the player was playing as someone else using an Animus to look into Desmond's past (who used an Animus).

Never played that game.


I'm doing a bit of head scratching for the rest of your post... you say:

when you're Echo-jumping, you're not taking possession of somebody, you're actually placing yourself in the memories of the person you're invading. So you'll appear physically because your power essentially places you in a "virtual realm" (I just made that up) to see the events as they happened in the past.

As a result of Echo-jumping, if you leave enough of an impression while sifting in their virtual realm of the past, they'll believe you were there to begin with

But then you say:

There is an established rule that the past is "set in stone".

Wouldn't leaving a strong enough impression change the past then? at least for that person?


And then you say:

So if you were to be Echo-jumping your 1.0 character, you'd be doing it as someone else entirely,

But you already said that you Echo jump as yourself O_o


I am by no means trying to defend my theory, just looking for clarification so I don't feel so nubtastic reading what you posted.