Grass

[KiriA500]

Graphics are a step backwards from 1.0 but no matter how many times i bring it up people keep saying its not an issue...

ps3 limitations*

I'd rather have "a step backwards in graphics" if it means not having boring stuff to look at all the time. 1.0 was bland to the extreme. I don't know how anybody can defend a world full of nothing, especially when it wasn't even that good looking to begin with.

[Shougun]

I'd rather have "a step backwards in graphics" if it means not having boring stuff to look at all the time. 1.0 was bland to the extreme. I don't know how anybody can defend a world full of nothing, especially when it wasn't even that good looking to begin with.

Speaking that 2.0 runs better then 1.0 I dont see the argument either that you couldn't have both.

Yoshida has put it in these terms, if you ran medium in 1.0 you will be running high in 2.0 no problem.

That means they have plenty of room to keep the high settings for those who actually want a real high setting.

That aside, I agree 1.0 was very flat >.>

[Meatdawg]

I'd rather have "a step backwards in graphics" if it means not having boring stuff to look at all the time. 1.0 was bland to the extreme. I don't know how anybody can defend a world full of nothing, especially when it wasn't even that good looking to begin with.

I'm not arguing content just the quality of the graphics.