Gil Destruction vs This 1/10th Idea

[Seth_Ahriman]

I know I'm gonna get ripped apart on this, but wouldn't it be better to erase gil, force people to invest in items and start the mkt back up from no gil with people wanting to sell items?

[Jacien]

[Ladon]

No because the 1/10th process has nothing to do with removing gil from the system. Once again, it's redenomination not removal.

[Hanabira]

no, removing people's hard work will in no way be beneficial for anyone, especially if they want to keep their existing playerbase. the 1/10th scaling idea makes the market more stable, without actually removing anything

[LlenCoram]

[Hanabira]

it would be silly anyways. since existing players and extremely well geared existing players will still dominate the market before new players can even earn well

[darkstarpoet1]

I know I'm gonna get ripped apart on this, but wouldn't it be better to erase gil, force people to invest in items and start the mkt back up from no gil with people wanting to sell items?

the only way this would work is to reset all levels and remove all items people have to start the market back up. i know, personally, i wouldn't even come back to try arr if they had this brilliant idea.

[Zantetsuken]

I know I'm gonna get ripped apart on this, but wouldn't it be better to erase (all) gil [...]

I'll meet you 90% of the way on this idea.

As it turns out, the devs will too.

[Fadigre]

Can't take these seriously anymore

[Wolfie]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination